Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers have the 27th ranked schedule based on SB odds

Nails

By Nails,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

X-Clown on 1 Experienced

X-Clown on 1

Posted
Posted

I'll add the effort, I guess....

 

Quote
  • The Super Bowl odds were provided by Bovada.lv
  • “1” is the hardest schedule and “32” is the easiest schedule
  • “Avg. Opp. SB Odds” is the average opponent Super Bowl odds ranked from 1-32. For example: If a team’s “Avg. Opp. SB Odds” is 14, it means this is equivalent to playing the 14th best team over the course of a full season. You can see how tight S.O.S is between No. 1 – 32, so a few good/bad matchups can really swing things quite a bit.
  • Changes are between now and our last update back in April.
Rank Team Avg. Opp. SB Odds SB Odds Changes
1. Redskins 12.75 6600 1
2. Chiefs 12.81 2500 -1
3. Eagles 13.56 5,000 -5
4. Cowboys 13.63 1200 0
5. Lions 14.13 6600 0
6. Bills 14.19 15000 1
6. Broncos 14.19 2500 4
8. Chargers 14.38 5000 -6
9. Falcons 14.50 1400 4
10. Buccaneers 14.56 3300 1
10. Dolphins 14.56 6600 1
12. Raiders 14.69 1000 0
13. Giants 14.75 2200 2
14. 49ers 14.81 30000 -7
15. Rams 14.88 15000 5
16. Jets 15.13 30000 2
17. Bears 15.19 15000 0
18. Saints 15.69 5000 -1
19. Packers 15.81 750 -1
20. Patriots 16.06 350 -2
21. Browns 16.31 30000 0
22. Ravens 16.38 5000 -1
22. Seahawks 16.38 1200 -1
22. Texans 16.38 2500 2
25. Bengals 16.56 6600 -1
26. Jaguars 16.63 10000 2
27. Panthers 16.75 2500 3
28. Titans 16.81 3300 -8
29. Cardinals 16.88 3300 0
30. Vikings 17.00 3300 6
31. Steelers 17.19 1200 -2
32. Colts 17.50 3300 0

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Icege
      Brooks RB, Placed on PUP, Out for 2025

      By Icege · Posted

      Considering you previously struggled to understand BTT despite it being explained in a video, write-up, and multiple replies, I get why this might be a little too complex for you. Happy to clarify again! Just let me know which part tripped you up this time. 😉
    • Khyber53
      a look at our 19 udfas

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      And, honestly, there's only so much you can attempt to do in the draft. And every draft pick is a roll of the dice. But that's where grabbing a ton of UDFAs, and targeting the best, makes a big difference. Sure, their individual chances of getting a hit here is less, but that shotgun pattern might just hit something.  Right now, we need bulk, partly to rebuild and partly to dilute the deep level of stank that has developed on this team in the last six years. If we're going to rebuild a culture built around culture, accountability and winning, then these UDFAs we bring in each season have to be the wash water that gets out that leftover dirt.  Canales seems to be a smart, culture-first, build up the good ones kind of guy. I like that and I hope he can keep it going here. But he was working against a locker room that had been taught to lose and taught to distrust or ignore coaches. He's got his work cut out for him, still. He does seem to have it moving in the right direction and that's something I was pretty amazed with by the end of last season.  
    • shaqattaq
      Strength of Schedule for 2025

      By shaqattaq · Posted

      The most telling sign, IMO, of a team on the upward swing is who we lost in the off-season. Who left that even saw the field? Woods, Clowney, Sanders, & Hekker. OK...no big deal. Clowney is the only 1 that I raised an eyebrow over and I get that it was a money decision. No need to pay him over $7M to take snaps from our draft picks when he was just OK last year.
×
×
  • Create New...