Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cubs Win, Cubs Win, Cubs Win !!!


2jakefansinva

Recommended Posts

Great game for us.   I was getting a bit worried but Kyle kept throwing a gem himself and kept on.    I still question even starting Schwarber and Zobrist but whatever.   I think Jon Jay needs to play at all times, on a team with so many free swingers we need a guy that just gets on base.     Luckily, pitching was on fire.    I just hope Lester comes out like we know he can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was a nail biter, October baseball, can't beat it.    I would have left Q in though, I have no confidence in Strop even though stats say he's a decent reliever, he's too shaky.   And the drop by Kyle, phew, glad we picked him up.     Almora needs to be in the lineup though, we need more consistency to balance out the free swingers.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/9/2017 at 8:54 PM, 2jakefansinva said:

Love Almora but he can't hit rightys at this time....kid can play.

Strop can't keep the ball down and near the zone....pisses me off.

Think Schwarbs will redeem himself tomorrow

This actually isn't true anymore.   Almora hit .271 against righties this year.    He's changed his game from last year.     I think people are so enamored with his vs L (.342) they don't realize he has a very respectable .271 on the other side.    He's actually done more damage against righties, 30 RBi and 14 doubles compared to 4 doubles and 16 RBI (4 homers on both sides).     Combined with above average fielding and smart baserunning, he should be playing every day.

Taking a look at Heyward, who does have top level defense, he's hitting worse than Almora by far.    L/R is .267/.256 .   He's really not a better option than Almora, all around, in any matchup but he'll get to play.   I guess you can't pay someone that much to sit.     Almora has contributed more than Heyward in way less time.     Even has a higher slugging and on base.     Heyward is definitely superior in defense and is faster but it's not a different like Heyward vs Schwarber there.     

Almora, Jay, and La Stella should be playing regularly over guys like Heyward, Schwarber, and Zobrist right now.      They are those GOOD players that aren't fantastic or bad but keep the gem moving.    At times, we have too many people swinging for the fences and those guys can make up for it.    I get Zobrist in playoffs based on what he's done though and timely hits.   It's a great roster with so many options but I think Maddon's infatuation with Schwarber's long ball is hurting us when it comes to putting people on base and defense in these close games vs a great pitching staff.     I'm not taking into account hitter vs batter history either, as I do know that comes into it as well.

I'm hoping we can load up on Roark, it's time for an offensive explosion this team is capable of.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Teams do some super stupid stuff with mid-fairly good QBs. I think they are just absolutely terrified they will be stuck with a QB that is not the quality of the QB they have now, even if its someone like Daniel Jones. Lots of trash QBs go in the first round. I encourage you to take a look at the sad, sad list of first round QBs in the last 15 years.  
    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
×
×
  • Create New...