Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

My Conclusion Up to Date


SetfreexX

Recommended Posts

We need a new coaching staff, top to bottom, clock management has been an issue since 2011, having to burn time outs, not taking opportunities when available (running clock out in the first half). We always play up and down to competition, the consistency is never there. 

We're not a true playoff team, by that I mean, I can't see us beating PHI, or NO on the road in the playoffs, we're just good enough to get in and lose the first game. This offense inspires ''0'' confidence, I don't see what's so hard about installing plays you see Reid, & Payton using for Hunt / Kamara / Hill <<< more so when Samuel was healthy, but Byrd has THAT speed also. 

I'm a fan all day everyday, and twice on Sundays, but I'm also not blind. We haven't shown enough through 3/4's of the season that inspires me to believe that anything drastic will change with the level of intensity that we play with. Love the team, and the POTENTIAL I just don't think this is the staff that can tap it. 

Last several years the BEST teams, have had one of two things, A) a coach with an offensive background, B) one of the leagues best OC's <<<< We have neither, ball control in the NFL DOES NOT WORK PLAYING FROM BEHIND. We are not built or coached to put up points, this snail, methodical ''we dictate'' crap has got to go, first two to three series we need to play with pace, save that clock possession strategy for HAVING A LEAD. We were down 17, and we were snapping the ball at :05 secs on a :40 second play-clock with the GAME CLOCK running, it's pathetic. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SetfreexX said:

We need a new coaching staff, top to bottom, clock management has been an issue since 2011, having to burn time outs, not taking opportunities when available (running clock out in the first half). We always play up and down to competition, the consistency is never there. 

We're not a true playoff team, by that I mean, I can't see us beating PHI, or NO on the road in the playoffs, we're just good enough to get in and lose the first game. This offense inspires ''0'' confidence, I don't see what's so hard about installing plays you see Reid, & Payton using for Hunt / Kamara / Hill <<< more so when Samuel was healthy, but Byrd has THAT speed also. 

I'm a fan all day everyday, and twice on Sundays, but I'm also not blind. We haven't shown enough through 3/4's of the season that inspires me to believe that anything drastic will change with the level of intensity that we play with. Love the team, and the POTENTIAL I just don't think this is the staff that can tap it. 

Last several years the BEST teams, have had one of two things, A) a coach with an offensive background, B) one of the leagues best OC's <<<< We have neither, ball control in the NFL DOES NOT WORK PLAYING FROM BEHIND. We are not built or coached to put up points, this snail, methodical ''we dictate'' crap has got to go, first two to three series we need to play with pace, save that clock possession strategy for HAVING A LEAD. We were down 17, and we were snapping the ball at :05 secs on a :40 second play-clock with the GAME CLOCK running, it's pathetic. 

 

Should have been inserted here

http://www.carolinahuddle.com/boards/topic/144521-what-needs-to-happen-isnt-likely-to/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not in same league. Caldwell just hit a 10.00 on the RAS. 2nd out of 3830 from 1987 onward.  https://x.com/MathBomb/status/2027885023387349047 Yeah I mean Louis had a sub 9.00 RAS. Still very very good, no doubt. Louis is small, no 2 ways about it. He is likely a sub package lb in nickel packages or specialized WLB. Be fine ST gunner to start for sure. 6 foot flat and 220lb is pushing it for a starting LB. At 10 to 20lbs less than the other LBs he'd better be closer to the top in most timed drills. He's gonna be challenged when some of the wrs in the class can matchup bigger stronger faster, much less TE in the run game.  Yeah instinct matter and he has them, but that size is a massive red flag compared to many of the other LBS in this class.    Rodriguez is the LB that really climbed this week from a pure grit guy to great flash with athleticism people wrote off cause he was a QB at first at UVA. 18.4mph in the backpedal. Production the last 2 years were great. I'd be thrilled with him as the future mike.   Hill likely moved out of 51 and into the top 45 picks ( Ravens at 45 I can't imagine don't bite if he makes it there). Honestly Hill imo is a 1st rounder and I'd be ok with him as he fits the MLB we have missed the last few years. People would crow it's a reach but he's top 30 all-time I'm RAS for a LB at 9.9+ . Plus he was big time in big games when he was healthy. And that br a big check: meds. 
    • Miller, Melo, Coby, Moose, and Bridges all on the floor at the same time must be a nightmare for defenses lol. Switch one out for Kon and still a nightmare. Coby really does bring a true 6th man value and looks like he could start if Melo was out after only a few games of getting his feet wet. 
×
×
  • Create New...