Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I notice a "fans" praising the Giants


TN05

Recommended Posts

37 minutes ago, thebigcat said:

An ownership group that doesn't tolerate mediocrity, what a novel thought

This is a depressingly common example of the "I'd rather see the Panthers lose" phenomenon I discussed in my post yesterday, this idea that:

A: Every organization is better than ours

and

B: The Panthers are mediocre

Let's compare our records over the last five years (including this year):

Panthers: 48-27-1, three division titles, one Super Bowl appearance
Giants: 32-44, no division titles, one playoff appearance

The latter is what true mediocrity looks like.

Ironically, the two successful years the Giants have had in recent memory (2007 and 2011) were in regular seasons where they snuck into the playoffs and managed to win as underdogs. Imagine if Mara had fired their coach in 2011 after their four-game skid that got them to 6-6, or with two weeks left where they were 7-7?

This is exactly what the "fans" that want us to lose would like to see, going into a month that is historically our best and when we are basically set to make the playoffs if we win two or three games.

Our motto is "Keep Pounding", not "give up". Let's Keep Pounding for a strong finish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, thebigcat said:

The Giants have two superbowls in ten years. We have participation trophies. They are on their way to getting the best GM we ever had

The Giants should have fired their coach in 2011 when they were 6-6 with your logic. Can't tolerate mediocrity!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...