Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So to review...

Delhommey

By Delhommey,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Guild Collaborator

Guild

Posted
Posted

I never said blitzing all the time was smart and don't try to say that wasn't the argument. I said ron meeks rarely ever blitzed wether it was here or in indy and you said we blitzed a lot in the first two games which we didn't. The argument was that ron meeks has never been an agressive dc which you totally denied. And you're still a whiny ass little wuss. Waaaaah he isn't a homer! Waaaaaah he won't stop being realistic. Waaaaaaah! Lmao

Well I'll give you that the Panther Cover 2 is pretty passive football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
monstercat Newbie

monstercat

Posted
Posted

Stupid people get on my nerves. Especially stupid people that never have anything good to say about anybody or anything.

The bottom line is that Meeks is coaching the Panthers now, and he does bring more pressure than he did with the Colts, and he does call play man to man coverage sometimes. This idea that he only plays zone, or that playing cover 2 is even anything new to the Panthers is ridiculous. Everybody's hero, Jack Del Rio, ran lots and lots of cover 2, and everybody thought that was the best defense ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gman was right Newbie

Gman was right

Posted
Posted

We ran cover two with the best front four in the nfl under del rio. This front four gets very little pressure. T davis has proven to be a very effective blitzer. They should have used him more and find different ways to get pressure. Too bad we don't have a creative or agressive coaching staff to trash these vanilla schemes. Waaaaaaah gman won't sugar coat! Waaaaah!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Candler Cat
      This Team...

      By Candler Cat · Posted

      The last child @ home has told me he wants to go to a game, so we're seeing vs Rams on the 30th
    • tukafan21
      Bryce Young Haters..

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Did we really shut them down though? They had 369 yards of offense.   That is 9 more yards than they average per game and 53 more than we give up per game this year.   If a team gave up 369 yards per game on defense, they'd be the 7th worst defense in the league this year. Yes, I will give our defense credit for having the 4th down stand near our goal line as well as creating the fumble that stopped their first drive, as they did rise to the occasion then, but even the INT was just a ridiculous play/throw and handed it to us and they also missed a FG. We didn't force them into a single punt all game.  We had 1 sack on a QB who had 37 pass attempts. They had drives of 56, 49, 50, 43, 58, and 71 yards (while we only had 2 over 40 yards ourselves). We bent, a lot, but never really broke, partially due to the Packers own mistakes, that's a far cry from "shutting them down" in my opinion.  Again, this is why I'm critical of us after a day like today, I'm able to look beyond a final score and evaluate how we played on the whole, and we keep squeaking out these wins despite not playing well at all.  And yes, that is what great teams do, but they also play well in the majority of their games, where as all we seem to do is squeak out ugly wins without ever playing all that well. I'm not saying I'm unhappy that we won, I've never once said anything like that, but when week after week I see serious concerns with how we played, then I'm going to call out what I see.
    • Butterflyj30
      Other 11/2 NFL games

      By Butterflyj30 · Posted

      Washington is going to have to do better than this
×
×
  • Create New...