Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hey gamers....


shinner

Recommended Posts

Yeah, that was my question as well. Is the 720 instead of 1080 visible on PS3 games?

On a 32...I would think it would be next to negligible...PS3 has blueray...but I'm sure it'd still look ok in 1080i mode on the 720p models. 1080p on a 32? Doubt you'd notice. I'd draw the line at 40" and up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a 32...I would think it would be next to negligible...PS3 has blueray...but I'm sure it'd still look ok in 1080i mode on the 720p models. 1080p on a 32? Doubt you'd notice. I'd draw the line at 40" and up.

That's basically what I read as well...that said, my 60" Pioneer plasma is 720p (bought before 1080p sets became affordable) looks pretty damn good playing bluray rips.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This would be 720p on a 37" that would be used almost exclusively for PS3/XBOX 360. Sub $500 out the door would be very enticing...

Pretty much my exact situation....kids have been playing on a 19" Sharp, el cheapo I bought a few Black Fridays ago so this will be a huge upgrade for them.

Maybe I missed it, but I don't see anything on there about processing speed. 60 HZ I assume?

Yep, 60Hz....I dunno if that's a huge deal though. I read A LOT of posts from people who end up turning the 120Hz off because they didn't like what it did to the picture. I paid more attention to the 5ms spec.

Looks like the LG might have a programmable remote too which is an advantage over the Vizio if you need the program multiple devices like a DVD, satellite/cable box, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think they changed as much as you think between the INT and the final sack (immediate pressure with 4 linemen). They definitely stopped blitzing as much, if a blitz means rushing more than the front 4/5. They definitely did some exotic packages where they sent LBs/DBs and dropped linemen into coverage though. The fumble and INT were both blitzes. And yes they were successful. And yes, I agreed with Bryce not taking care of the ball. Really not many answers on those plays - just take the sack and live another play (unless you're Lamar). Which he didn't do. And no, you can't run prevent on the goal line. What's prevent defense to you? Alignment, personnel, cushion, etc.? Just curious. My reply was to the post that they sat back in some soft zone the whole game - until the end, when it mattered. That's not true. They blitzed, they disguised coverages and blitzers, they pressed, they bailed, they covered the flats, all of that. Not trying to argue. Just trying to inform. Actually they only blitzed once on the final drive, and the DB got away with a bad hold on Tremayne. Otherwise looked like it would have been a completion for a first down. The Cardinals' final drive defense looked a lot like the rest of the game.  I know it's easy to get upset after a lose (I'm guilty), but Mondays are when cooler heads prevail. Right? Emotions can make us seem like we don't know what we're talking about. The Huddle isn't supposed to be that. I always saw it as a place to go discuss the Carolina Panthers with more than the casual fan, and their emotionally charged opinions. I can get that at the local grocery store, where they don't know anything about NC/SC, let alone the Panthers. 
    • Poor guy went from the Ravens to this disaster
    • You have to make the best of it and find moments of happiness.  So, I picked up the Falcons D in my money league for this week. 
×
×
  • Create New...