Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

New Mock draft w/trade down & up scenario's


DynastyRTR

Recommended Posts

trade down scenario:

-Trade the 48th overall pick to Arizona for the 58th overall pick and the 195th overall pick(6th rd) and a 2011 6th rd pick.

2(#58)-Mardy Gilyard-WR-Concinnatti

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lwkfF54rAEk

6'0, 187-4.47

3(#78)-Austen Lane-DE-Murray State

6'6,276-4.84

4(#112)-A.J. Edds-SLB-Iowa

6-4,246-4.71

-Trade pick #'s 175(6th rd) and 223(7th rd) to Kansas City for pick #142(5th rd).

5(#142)-Mike Neal-DT-Purdue

6'3,294-4.87

6(#195)-David Reed-WR-Utah

6'0,191-4.52

6-compensation(#202)-Leigh Tiffin-K-Alabama

6'1,209-?

6-compensation(#204)-Tim Hiller-QB-Western Michigan

6'4,229-4.94

7-compensation(#249)-Dorian Brooks-OG-James Madison

6'2, 306-5.16

Link to comment
Share on other sites

trade up scenario:

-trade pick #48 and 2011 2nd rd pick to St. Louis for pick #33 overall and pick #155(5th rd)

2(#33)-Golden Tate-WR-Notre Dame

5'11,195-4.36

3(#78)-Tyson Alualu-DT-California

6'3,294-4.87

4(#112)-A.J. Edds-SLB

-Trade pick #'s 175(6th rd) and 223(7th rd) to Cleveland for pick #137(5th rd)

5(#137)-Daniel Te'o Nesheim-DE-Washington

6'4,267-4.72

5(#155)-Leigh Tiffin-K-Alabama

6-compensation(#202)-Armanti Edwards-QB/WR-App. State

5'11, 192-4.41

6-compensation(#204)-Chris DeGeare-OG/C-Wake Forest

6'4,325-5.16

7-compensation(#249)-Nick Polk-Indiana-SS

5'11,218-4.56

Link to comment
Share on other sites

trade down scenario:

-Trade the 48th overall pick to Arizona for the 58th overall pick and the 195th overall pick(6th rd) and a 2011 6th rd pick.

2(#58)-Mardy Gilyard-WR-Concinnatti

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lwkfF54rAEk

6'0, 187-4.47

Funny. I'm playing in a draft game being the Panthers GM and did that trade with the Cards who select Jermaine Gresham, it was: 48th and 110th picks for 58th and 90th picks. With that pick i select...guess it: Lamarr Houston :D

I love the first mock: Gilyard, Edds, Neal and Tiffin (:D) are great picks, althought i don't fall in love with Gilyard as some of you.

Someboy should make a scouting report of Austen Lane. I'm hearing about this guy too much lately in this forum and is almost impossible to read or watch something.

BTW i prefer Antonio Brown instead of David Reed.

Great work man!

Regards!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would rather have CB crezdon butler in the 5th rather than a kicker...I'm also not crazy about Edwards but I love the te'o neshiem and aj Edds pick.

why CB when we have Gamble, Munnerlyn, Hudson, Wilson(also a safety), and Marshall if he and Wilson sign their tender's. 5 CB's..actually 6 if you count Marcus Walker who is on the practice squad. reason I went kicker is because Kasay nor Baker can kick the ball into/near the endzone on kickoffs and Kasay isn't getting any younger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why CB when we have Gamble, Munnerlyn, Hudson, Wilson(also a safety), and Marshall if he and Wilson sign their tender's. 5 CB's..actually 6 if you count Marcus Walker who is on the practice squad. reason I went kicker is because Kasay nor Baker can kick the ball into/near the endzone on kickoffs and Kasay isn't getting any younger.

I agree about kasay but my biggest thing is that I doubt fox goes with a rookie over a vet for something as important as kicking duties. As far as the secondary here are some of my concerns:

1) Will Marshall be here next year? We gave him a small tender and he may go for big money next season which would leave us thin at cornerback. Not to mention what if we have an injury this season?

2) Marcus Hudson played safety for the 49ers do he can fill in at either position. So basically if we pick up a safety or a corner in the draft he could fill either...wherever we need him.

3) I love munneryln but I don't think he is cut out to be a full time starter...as good as he was last year I think he is best as a nickleback. Maybe he could be a stud but I'd like to have a young player back there who could step up in a year or two while providing depth right now.

I also like the idea of drafting a legitimate safety or at least someone who could play a few games if there is an injury...which is why I really like the safety Folk in the 7th. I like the secondary but I just think we need some more bodies back there in case of injuries. But that's just my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well that's part of where the disconnect is then, you think Chark was a "solid NFL player" I couldn't disagree more, he's someone who had one solid NFL season and then was at best a JAG the rest of his career, I wouldn't call that a "solid NFL player" If he was a #3 WR and put up the stats he did outside of that 1 season, then sure, he's a "solid NFL player" but he put up those numbers as the #1 WR in 3 of his 4 seasons that he had meaningful roles and the #2 in a high powered offense the 4th.   That's not good and not what I'd call a "solid NFL player"
    • Everything always makes sense in hindsight. Hell, I've seen guys who were touted by everyone as slam dunk "safest player in the draft" type prospects bust massively. Remember Aaron Curry? Robert Gallery? I'm just never going to say that a prospect is definitely a better NFL player than a solid NFL player. Better as a prospect? Sure, you can always make those arguments. But ultimately it comes down to what you do on Sundays and what you did on Saturdays just isn't relevant when you're talking about who's the better NFL player.
    • And that's totally fair to say, but I think it also shows you guys are conflating what I'm saying with thinking I'm saying something like, "T-Mac will 100% have a better NFL career than Chark had" which is a completely different statement and one I'd agree, you can't really say about any NFL player before they've ever taken a snap. Because what I'm saying, is that T-Mac's actual ability and skills right now, are at a higher level than Chark's ever were, it's a completely different statement that is independent of what his NFL output will be. Look at it this way, without even knowing what the rest of Chark's career turned out to be, would anyone seriously say they'd take Chark after the 2019 season over today's T-Mac if they somehow were in a draft and we were deciding between the two?  As even after that season, his potential was never what T-Mac's is right now. Even with those other prospects, I'm sure some of them before their NFL career started, still had more ability and physical talent than Chark had, because again, this is so much less about T-Mac and so much more about Chark.  A bad coach, system, QB, injuries, etc, that derail a WR's career no matter how good they may have been and is much more of the reason they were a bust than their own abilities.   Chark was a tall WR with little WR speed, he was a deep ball threat and wasn't even particularly great at it, he was not that good of an actual WR. If the Jags had another above average WR in 2019, then Chark doesn't get his 1k season that I think people are getting too hung up on in thinking he was some great player in this league.
×
×
  • Create New...