Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

MW2 vs. BFBC II


Carolina Husker

Recommended Posts

Modern Warfare 2 is more exciting in my opinion. It's very gimmicky though. I will admit that.

When I'm done winning a game of BFBC2, I feel like I have accomplished more. I feel like it took so much more thought, and putting that thought into place. I also feel like this game is more conducive to people who don't necessarily have the fastest reflexes.

Like you said, Husker, it's hard to compare the 2. The similarities pretty much stop at them both being first person shooters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BF2 FTW.

Seriously, dont you all get tired of :

1. Screaming moron kids

2. Numerable hacks

3. Stupid weapons (akimbo)

4. No Team play

Also, i get tired of hearing people complain about camping. If someone wants to camp, let them. Especially when defending a target and its strategically smart. Now if its my team, and we are playing RUSH or something, then yeah, it pisses me off.

One thing i do hate is the lack of communication when you choose to join a random squad. Its funny, most of the time no one will talk, but when they do, it seems like the whole squad will talk. Makes me wonder if its the game and not the people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BF2 FTW.

Seriously, dont you all get tired of :

1. Screaming moron kids

2. Numerable hacks

3. Stupid weapons (akimbo)

4. No Team play

1.No teamwork so I don't have chat on.

2. On ps3 so hacks aren't a problem

3. Yea, kinda gimmicky

4. Not all online games need to be team-based.

I like MW2 a lot. I like BC2 a lot. BC2 is dominating my ps3 right now because it is new. When the map packs come out on ps3 for MW2, I will switch back and forth. BC2 is less intense, and I like intensity from time to time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MW2 has a lot of good qualities for sure, but i started getting frustrated with it. Especially the hacks on XBOX and the boosting, etc...as far as intesity, not sure i agree MW2 is more intense. I personally dont switch back and forth. Ill probably never play MW2 again.

1.No teamwork so I don't have chat on.

2. On ps3 so hacks aren't a problem

3. Yea, kinda gimmicky

4. Not all online games need to be team-based.

I like MW2 a lot. I like BC2 a lot. BC2 is dominating my ps3 right now because it is new. When the map packs come out on ps3 for MW2, I will switch back and forth. BC2 is less intense, and I like intensity from time to time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MW2 has a lot of good qualities for sure, but i started getting frustrated with it. Especially the hacks on XBOX and the boosting, etc...as far as intesity, not sure i agree MW2 is more intense. I personally dont switch back and forth. Ill probably never play MW2 again.

I get frustrated with it as well. It definitely has some problems. I never really had experience with hacks, but the boosting was annoying. I just left a game if people were boosting though. I just think Modern Warfare is more intense because it's faster paced. But that is just my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know this has already been stated, but it makes sense. I own both games for the 360 and enjoy both of them equally. They are completely different games, so comparison is weak. It seems that what one game lacks, the other game excells at. When you get sick of one game, it is always refreshing to pop in the other and go ham.

I played the original battlefield 1942 and the first Call of Duty on PC, a lot. I'm glad both franchises are getting better at what their games are intended to deliver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am trying to remember when I EVER said reach for need. My thing if someone falls you jump, if you can trade back a few slots and get help at the right value and pick up some ammo to move up from 51 which I think is outside the money zone, then you do that.   Take a WR later. Plenty of capable WRs have come from the 3rd round. Though this year I would go for C there if there was a reasonable choice. Take a TE if you must. I see more reason to take WR than TE. I think you give guys drafted two years ago and last year a chance to develop before cancelling them.    I think it is kind of unrealistic to throw everything all in on offense in hopes of going deep in the playoffs after an 8-10 year, even if it did have some nice bright spots in it.    And outside of this argument but relevant to it, I am bothered by Canales and Morgan and their apparent posture that we have arrived and are now in the big boy club. I don’t know where that comes from. They are out there talking like they are winners at 8-10. Backing into the playoffs in a real convoluted tie breaker scenario. They had some good games, yes. But the big feather n the cap, the LA Rams matchups, did you see what the Rams did? They didn’t fire the coaches but they fired their defensive backs. Bryce beat them yes, and it was pretty, but it was kind of like the Bucs and Mike Evans picking on our decimated secondary in 2022. Someone (Wilks) went down for allowing that to happen and they went down in LA too.  Wr aren’t as good as a whole lot of homers think we are. Shore up the trenches.    I think too many fans buy into it because they are so starved for anything that looks like a winner. 
    • How exactly does one win OROY "by default"? Wouldn't winning the award mean that of the two, McMillon stayed strong the entire year while the other guy didn't and fizzled out? That's like saying Secretariat only won by default because the other horse stopped moving midway through the race. Absolutely zero logic in that statement, which makes me very glad that I've never really paid much attention to Walterfoozball.
    • I agree, teams in the past have fired the HC in order to retain a coach on staff...hell it happened to Mcderp this year, rams in the past and Im missing another.  The fall off for the Panthers team defense was huge once Mcderp leftd and Ron could not fix it even when he named himself DC. 
×
×
  • Create New...