Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Great Article on the Finals


Delhommey

Recommended Posts

Like all soccer writers, I have a debilitating nostalgic streak, and like all soccer writers, I love Holland. The Dutch, who face Spain in Sunday's World Cup final, are soccer's most gorgeous losers, a team defined by a single generation of players who brilliantly failed to reach their potential. The Dutch teams of the 1970s—led by the mercurial Johan Cruyff, who's widely considered the greatest European player of all time—launched a tactical revolution, played one of the most thrilling styles of their era, and lost two consecutive World Cup finals in memorable and devastating ways. In the process, they became the icons of soccer romantics who would rather see teams play beautifully and lose than win and be boring. That's a harsh legacy for any team that just wants to take home trophies, and this year's Dutch squad is trying hard to transcend it. The dreams of millions of fans are riding on their success. Personally, I hope they fail.

http://www.slate.com/id/2259911/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

as a long time Dutch fan, I think one of the biggest differences with this team is that they are a team. Too often in the past they were a bunch of individuals that were playing for their country and themselves. This time though, they almost all look to be playing as a team. Van Persie might be the exception at this point.

Both teams play a very similar style right now, they both like lots of possession and they aren't afraid to move the ball backwards if it means keeping possession. Prior to yesterday's game, I was hoping to not have to play Germany in the final, but I am pretty sure we would have played them in a similar fashion as Spain did yesterday and who knows what might have happened. I just hope that the Dutch management doesn't try the same passive game that the Germans played yesterday...that obviously doesn't work.

I just know I am extremely excited about Sunday and if...IF...Holland can prevail, it will be one of the biggest sporting days in my life!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nobody's playing as beautifully as Spain right now. Having watched them slowly, patiently and methodically probe and attack two of the best defenses in the Cup, I'm in love. Not to mention they all but nullified the feared German counterattack.

My heart's with both teams, but I can't disagree with this article at all.

I won't be dissappointed with either side winning. It's like if UT played Auburn for the NC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly. FSU = USMNT

But as I lived in Spain and Holland (well the Netherlands technically), I have a soft spot for them.

My brother's an Auburn grad (and I generally like their style of play) and I live in Austin. With Texas and Auburn very unlikely to meet in a head to head, it's not that hard for me to maintain.

UT fans are starting to annoy me though (not totally unlike Barça fans, really)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have family in Austin and Dallas, and it's only strengthened their hatred of UT. I imagine it's got to be something like being around UNC fans all the time, except there's not NC State or Duke fans to water them down.

And I wish the USMNT had as much success in their history as FSU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, no. A good majority of UT fans have a good grasp of the game. You cannot say that about UNC.

Longhorn fans are annoying by not only wanting to win, but wanting to win a certain way.

They also tend to have this ridiculously high opinion of what their team should do that just crumbles at the first sign of adversity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
    • Blacksheer's time was up when they drafted Etienne. 
×
×
  • Create New...