Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It only took 2 games for Moore to turn into Delhomme?

drewbreesisgod2

By drewbreesisgod2,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

drewbreesisgod2 Newbie

drewbreesisgod2

Posted
Posted

What the heck? I thought Moore was the answer after those last 4 games of last year? Shouldn't have run Delhomme out of town man. As far as those folks who want Clausen to be a 'game manager'....I saw an interview with Madden this weekend. He said "Anytime a quarterback is mentioned as a 'game manager' it essentially means he sucks.

Now you guys are starting to see just how good Jake was with that run related offense that is run.

Peace out and I hope you get on a run, because we can't have Tampa and Atlanta racking up wins...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherFanForLife Newbie

PantherFanForLife

Posted
Posted

Again, not knocking anyone, just saying it's VERY hard to be a qb in that offense.

f**k that. Matt is no Delhomme. It took Delhomme years without receiving help and stubborn coaching, drafting to turn into "Delhomme". Matt hasn't done what Delhomme did for us. Matt didn't get us to a SB, Matt didn't engineer I don't know how many 4th quarter drives and Matt doesn't have the fire or leadership abilities Delhomme had.

Matt doesn't deserve to be compared to Delhomme. Stop dissing the best QB this team ever had up to this point.

These Delhomme/Matt comparisons need to end. Delhomme played for us for 7 years!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
drewbreesisgod2 Newbie

drewbreesisgod2

Posted
  • Author
Posted

PatherFanForLife...read my whole post. I was actually a big Delhomme fan. What my post was saying is "Delhomme was actually very undervalued because he was honestly alot more clutch than anyone thought"

I mean he had to complete so many clutch passes and had to be so precise because I'm sure it was hard to get into a rhythm when you are running the ball 70% of the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherFanForLife Newbie

PantherFanForLife

Posted
Posted

PatherFanForLife...read my whole post. I was actually a big Delhomme fan. What my post was saying is "Delhomme was actually very undervalued because he was honestly alot more clutch than anyone thought"

I mean he had to complete so many clutch passes and had to be so precise because I'm sure it was hard to get into a rhythm when you are running the ball 70% of the time.

I know dude but just phrasing your title in that manner is perpetuation a huge disrespect that has been going on for too long for Delhomme. And yes it is hard to get into a passing rythm when you run all the time I agree. Just like yesterday was hard to get into a running rhythm and punch that touchdown in when we used PASSING from Jimmy to get us in that position.

I just cannot understand the logic in our playcalling. I'm sure they have some, but I don't get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      The Ringer NFC Offseason podcast

      By CRA · Posted

      I consider last year Bryce's rookie year.....and I expect some regression/D adjustment in his second season in Canales' O.  Film is film.   So yeah, I agree....he won't be the dude that opened up the year week 1 or closed the door week 17.  We will get some dude in between it all most likely.  Which IMO puts us in a really awkward no man's land with Bryce.   
    • Navy_football
      The Ringer NFC Offseason podcast

      By Navy_football · Posted

      The question is which Bryce shows up game 1. Do we get week 2 (2024) Bryce, or week 18 (2024) Bryce?  I will say that his progression after the benching last year was amazing. He literally got better every game - sans Dallas. Like every week he did something we hadn't seen him do before. And it wasn't luck, toss it up for grabs plays like Penix did against Carolina. Penix was just throwing the ball as hard as he could in the direction of a receiver and hoping they'd make a play for him. What we saw from Bryce was different. Decision making, reading defenses, recognizing blitzes and where they were coming from, knowing his hot, avoiding pressure and manipulating the pocket, throwing with anticipation, taking shots downfield, and running the ball surprisingly well. Stats don't always tell the story. Did he miss some throws that he should have made - sure did. But the clutch gene is strong with this one. One score game and Carolina has the ball with 2 minutes on the clock - I'm confident he'll give them a chance to win more than he doesn't. 
    • Navy_football
      Easy money - go to Vegas today

      By Navy_football · Posted

      I really like David Moore. He's a reliable WR. Smart, doesn't drop the ball and he's where he's supposed to be. Now, he ain't gonna route up a DB. He ain't gonna 50/50 ball a DB. He ain't gonna run by a DB either. But he runs a good enough route and catches the ball - definitely an NFL average WR. Every team could use a David Moore. Now if this receiving group can force Dan and Dave to let him go, then this team has come a long way since 2023. A LONG way. But I will say that Horn's speed is a big deal. They don't really have another guy with speed and quickness to blow the top off the defense and make guys miss in space after the catch, though he is still a rookie and hasn't done it in the NFL. If he and Renfrow push Moore out, then we might actually have something gents. Plus I see Renfrow as Thielen's replacement in 2026. I just don't think Coker is the reliable, move the chains guy like Thielen. Could be wrong. 
×
×
  • Create New...