Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How can anyone justify Moore over Clausen at this point?


Carl Spackler

Recommended Posts

Both opinions...this is more of a fact based thread.

Dude please be real if your a new coach or coaching staff coming to this team. You have 3 choices in front of you.

1. Go with the young QB who has 3 years left on a contract with the team.

2. Draft a QB that you like with the high 1st round pick you get from this bad

season.

3. Sign back a 27 year old back up most of his carear too be your Future qb who more then likely went 4-12 or 3-13 the year before.

Being a football fan what 2 things have a better chance of happening?

Please try too be realistic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we are being real then you know first of all that Matt possibly can't go 4-12 or 3-13 but again that shaky math is showing up. Second, he will probably be back if he even plays mediocre ball the rest of the year. Finally, no matter what happens the new coach will bring in someone who is his guy, rookie or vet so its not like Clausen is guaranteed to play next year at all.

Realistic enough for you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we are being real then you know first of all that Matt possibly can't go 4-12 or 3-13 but again that shaky math is showing up. Second, he will probably be back if he even plays mediocre ball the rest of the year. Finally, no matter what happens the new coach will bring in someone who is his guy, rookie or vet so its not like Clausen is guaranteed to play next year at all.

Realistic enough for you?

Are you a lawyer?

You are not anwsering the question.

Thier is no way Matt comes back unless he goes 8-8 or 7-9 and turns into what he was at the end of last season and leads the team too the playoffs. You can live on Make up Island if you want but I stay in the real world. Matt already was in a bad spot when they drafted Jimmy he already had too play out his mind to keep the job in the 1st place. He would have too be superman to stay on this roster after this season. Starting him over Jimmy now does nothing but set this team back unless you think he gets us too the Playoffs now do you think that can happen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I am saying is that....

Clausen is guaranteed to be a Panthers next year, Matt is not. Given Matt's inability to produce this year; why not let the rookie play it out?

Matt had too short of a window to showcase he can produce. You can't take that small of a sample size and consider it truth. Fox doesn't care about letting the rookie play (neither does Smith, DWill, Gross, etc) he (they) wants to win and Moore gives the team a better chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Passer Rating Differential = Offensive Passer Rating  - Defensive Passer Rating    Offensive Passer Rating = how efficient your team’s QBs are. Defensive Passer Rating Allowed = how efficient opposing QBs are against your defense. The larger the positive differential, the more dominant your team’s passing game is relative to opponents’ passing success. Conversely, a negative differential means your defense is getting carved up or your offense isn’t efficient enough. Almost every Super Bowl champion from the 1970s to the present day finished near the top of the league in DPRD (Defensive Passer Rating Differential). https://coldhardfootballfacts.com/stats/passer-ratings-differential Look at where we are #16 and we have a Negative DPRD (-0.36). Every team above us has a a positive DPRD, is .500 or better, and still in running for a playoff spot.  Look at the chart. The best teams in the NFL have the highest DPRD. Only 2 teams below us with a negative DPRD are still in contention or the playoffs: #19 San Francisco (-4.44) and # 21 Tampa Bay(-6.62). And, Tampa has no shot if they fail to beat us down the stretch at least once. The teams with the highest negative DPRD always seem to be at the bottom of the standings. I didn't learn about this stat until 15 years ago. It's amazing how it always seems to accurately predict who will be in playoff contention year end and year out. 1 = Los Angeles Rams 111.76 85.23 26.53 2 3 Philadelphia Eagles 100.00 75.57 24.43 3 1 Seattle Seahawks 100.30 77.42 22.88 4 1 Buffalo Bills 104.20 82.66 21.54 5 1 Los Angeles Chargers 91.46 71.19 20.27 6 1 Houston Texans 90.70 72.40 18.30 7 1 Detroit Lions 110.41 94.40 16.01 8 1 New England Patriots 109.10 96.75 12.35 9 3 Green Bay Packers 102.95 92.09 10.86 10 1 Denver Broncos 89.21 78.78 10.43 11 1 Indianapolis Colts 95.12 85.91 9.21 12 = Pittsburgh Steelers 97.42 89.90 7.52 13 = Baltimore Ravens 93.87 86.91 6.96 14 2 Jacksonville Jaguars 88.07 81.23 6.84 15 4 Chicago Bears 89.48 88.70 0.78 16 2 Carolina Panthers 88.77 89.13 -0.36 17 2 Arizona Cardinals 93.49 95.79 -2.30 18 1 Kansas City Chiefs 88.85 92.46 -3.61 19 1 San Francisco 49ers 96.87 101.31 -4.44 20 1 Atlanta Falcons 87.50 92.50 -5.00 21 3 Tampa Bay Buccaneers 89.77 96.39 -6.62 22 = Dallas Cowboys 98.69 108.92 -10.23 23 = New York Giants 87.74 98.84 -11.10 24 1 New Orleans Saints 84.97 96.17 -11.20 25 1 Miami Dolphins 88.33 102.37 -14.04 26 3 Minnesota Vikings 75.03 90.31 -15.28 27 3 Las Vegas Raiders 83.50 99.14 -15.64 28 = Cincinnati Bengals 84.51 104.46 -19.95 29 2 Washington Commanders 87.24 107.74 -20.50 30 3 Cleveland Browns 70.46 91.41 -20.95 31 1 New York Jets 77.75 104.86 -27.11 32 = Tennessee Titans 76.27 106.03 -29.76  
    • Yeah and truthfully I’ll be ok with that as long as the talent and culture is building. 
    • We have been on the right side of one score games.  But like minny a few years ago and KC, we know that isnt sustainable and we probably will revert back to the nfl mean.  Which could mean a poo season incoming if this offense doesnt figure poo out
×
×
  • Create New...