Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Give credit where due


Davis83

Recommended Posts

The Defense:

18th in pts allowed = 21.4

This while being on the field on average 36-38 minutes of the game. This while our O has given the other team the ball on short fields so many times - and many of those the D held them to 3pts.

Now the following look really good, but are driven by defending a short field following turn overs.

4th in TOT Yds = 301.7

5th in Pass Yds = 182.7

YES, I acknowledge that there have been a few blown coverages, several bone head plays, but what team ever goes thru a season without that happening from time to time? I'm just impressed that as bad as we have looked, the D has for all intensive purposes looked good.

The D is 6th in interceptions with 10 - they have forced 4 fumbles and recovered 3. I'd say thats pretty respectable.

There is not much thay can do when we turn the ball over and the opposing team begins in the Red Zone.

So with all the frustration and being haters - lets at least acknowledge that our D has played good enough for us to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOTS of posts here talk about the defense being on the field so long. Fact is if the offense had the ball only 2 min and 59 sec per more game it would be 50% offense and 50% defense.

Patriots D is on field more than Panthers and they're doing pretty good. 6-1

http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?season=2010&seasonType=REG&defensiveStatisticCategory=GAME_STATS&d-447263-o=2&conference=ALL&tabSeq=2&role=OPP&d-447263-p=1&d-447263-s=TIME_OF_POSS_SECONDS_PER_GAME_AVG&d-447263-n=1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The avergae makes it look like close to 50%. I'm seeing several 36+"s and remember I'm talking ALOT of short fields in those minutes.

Rams = 36:28

49ers = 36:05

Bears 29:41

Saints = 38:22

Bengals 23:88 = this is the one that throws the average out of wack

Bucs 29:00

Giants = 34:39

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He should've been more than a JAG, but Jeremy Chinn.  I was convinced he was our next defensive star 
    • I see what you did there
    • Yeah the only way current set up is fun is if every year a different tiny school builds a super team and makes a run. You just need 1 rich guy to say you know what would be funny, if I drop 30 million and my school has a shot at a national championship.   They won't ever do it but put some sort of tiered salary cap in place and sign them to 4 year deals. You can only transfer up or down tiers no lateral moves because mean ole coach at texas doesn't play me enough so I'm going to Tennessee. So a player at prairie view can transfer to texas and get paid more or a player from UNC can transfer to UNCG because he isn't getting playing time. If a guy is transferring "up" he can get a salary bump if the team has salary cap space. A guy transferring down has to stay at the same salary as he signed his 4 year deal for so the lower tier team would have to have the cap space to sign him. It would stop the money chasing for lateral moves but allow guys who improve massively at lower schools to make more money as juniors and seniors and hopefully keep more guys in one place because the contract is for 4 years.
×
×
  • Create New...