Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Free Spicy Chicken Biscuits


Kettle

Recommended Posts

Thanks Klong!

Make sure you print out your coupon and bring a physical copy into the store. They will not take your reservation on your phone email (even though u give them all ur info prior and they have it on a list with ur address and phone number, etc)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

says they may ask for ID too. i was thinking of doing multiple before seeing that. i've already had one without a coupon, and they are delicious. JR should switch from bojangles.

Yeahhhh I pretty much got in an argument with the girl last time with the Spicy Chicken Sandwich b.c NO WHERE on the coupon did it say you needed the physical copy. I didnt think I would need it b/c u sign up and they have ur name on a list with ur address, phone number, etc.

So she was like sorry corporate says we need to give them a physical copy. So i storm out of there and go home to look at my coupon to verify that it says nowhere you need to present the physical copy (cuz I was just showing it to her on my phone)

Then after all that, I talk to my friend Nick and bitch to him about it and he says ur gonna hate me, but I went to that same location and showed them my phone and they gave it to me....I was so mad. So, I sent them an email to their corporate address knowing with their awesome customer service, I would still get a free one (couldnt get it at that point b/c u can only go in a certain time frame), and after reading my email they sent me a free coupon.

So, yeah. print out the confirm email.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I heard they come out officially next week?

I assume it is the same spicy chicken that is in the Spicy Chicken sandwich, so you could buy a biscuit in the morning and go back at lunch get a Spicy sandwich exchange bun for biscuit, scrap the pickles and you're in. Thank me later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
    • Get any shot you can at humane society, so much cheaper
×
×
  • Create New...