Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Oh Haaaaaawky


Matt Foley

Recommended Posts

NFL: Rams....loved their uniforms when I was a kid

MLB: Angels....lived in Reds territory and as Big Red Machine wound down, picked my own American League team to follow

NCAA Bask: UK....grew up in Kentucky

NCAA Foot: USC....because of the 55-24 win over Notre Dame I watched at my grandparents house

NBA: Whatever team in playoffs has most UK players or Celtics

NHL: Bruins...loved the wheel spoke logo

When you grow up in Louisville, there are no pro teams. Most choose Cincy teams, but Bengals never interested me and got sick of the Reds.

We should do a thread about this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Irony yes you could say that as long as there is no intent to claim that because he left we all of a sudden got so bad we are losing all the time. Which it seems like you might be trying to imply.  Did we lose something? Yes we did. Was it worth 5 years at 28 mil per? Not to my thinking.   
    • https://www.facebook.com/MEMES.of.the.NFL/videos/779983564773360/ LOL 
    • First: What do you think the word ‘scapegoating’ means? Because what I said was not scapegoating.  They are two different players playing two different roles.  I simply said two things about Burns, if I recall. One, basically he is a one dimensional player that is doing well because they have a very strong front in NY.  Two, I was against paying his price because he is a liability against the run. One dimensional and therefore not worth it.  Summing it up: he e is a pass rush specialist, about all I have ever felt about him, and his financial demands made him much less of a value.  IMO. 
×
×
  • Create New...