Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NBA Playoffs Rd 2: Los Angeles Lakers vs. Dallas Mavericks


King Taharqa

Recommended Posts

dm4sq9.gif

(2) Los Angeles Lakers (57-25)

STARTING 5

246.jpg

PG # 2 Derek Fisher

6'1 210 lbs

Arkansas-Little Rock '96

6.8 PPG 2.7 APG 1.1 SPG 80.6 FT% 39.6 3PT%

110.jpg

SG #24 Kobe "Black Mamba" Bryant

6'6 205 lbs

Lower Merion HS '96 (Ardmore, PA)

25.3 PPG 4.7 APG 5.1 RPG 82.9 FT% 32.3 3PT%

25.jpg

SF # 37 Ron Artest

6'7 260 lbs

St. John's '99

8.5 PPG 3.3 RPG 2.1 APG 1.5 SPG 35.6 3PT%

996.jpg

PF #16 Pau Gasol

7'0 250 lbs

Spain '01

18.8 PPG 10.2 RPG 3.3 APG 1.6 BPG 53.0 FG%

2748.jpg

C #17 Andrew Bynum

7'0 285 lbs

St. Joseph's HS '05 (Metuchen, NJ)

11.3 PPG 9.4 RPG 2.0 BPG 57.4 FG%

BENCH

PG-Steve Blake

SG-Shannon Brown

SF-Luke Walton

PF-Lamar Odom

C-Theo Ratliff

C-Joe Smith

HEAD COACH

phil_jackson.jpg

Phil "Zen Master" Jackson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

335h7v6.gif

(3) Dallas Mavericks (57-25)

STARTING 5

429.jpg

PG #2 Jason Kidd

6'4 210 lbs

California '94

7.9 PPG 8.2 APG 4.4 RPG 1.7 SPG 34.0 3PT%

3963.jpg

SG #4 Rodrigue Beaubois

6'2 182 lbs

Guadeloupe '09

8.4 PPG 1.9 RPG 2.3 APG

510.jpg

SF #0 Shawn Marion

6'7 228 lbs

UNLV '99

12.5 PPG 6.9 RPG 52.0 FG%

609.jpg

PF #41 Dirk Nowitzki

7'0 245 lbs

Germany '98

23.0 PPG 7.0 RPG 51.7 FG% 39.3 3PT% 89.2 FT%

984.jpg

C #6 Tyson Chandler

7'1 235 lbs

Dominguez HS '01 (Compton, CA)

10.1 PPG 9.4 RPG 1.1 BPG 65.4 FG%

BENCH

PG-Jose Juan Barea

SG-Jason Terry

SG-DeShawn Stevenson

SF-Peja Stojakovic

SF-Corey Brewer

PF-Brian Cardinal

C-Brendan Haywood

HEAD COACH

30010.jpg

Rick Carlisle

-----------------------------

Can Dallas bigs, Dirk, Tyson, & Haywood, outplay LA's bigs, Bynum, Gasol, & Odom? That is the question. I say no. Lakers in 6.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This draft is 2023 all over again, it's not hard to see. QB's who don't grade out as high first round prospects while at the same time, the following draft class looks to be loaded with elite QB prospects. Drafting a QB just because you need one (or making a bad trade to make said draft pick), when there isn't one worthy of that draft pick, is how you ruin franchises, just look at us right now.  
    • I upgraded to the S24+ a few weeks back. Very happy with it. 
    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.   And yes, I've never said I'm not a T-Mac homer. But me being that doesn't change that he will be the highest graded offensive player in this year's draft, at a position we haven't been able to solve since we lost Smitty.  Taking him makes all the sense in the world, my bias aside.
×
×
  • Create New...