Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NBA Playoffs Rd 2: Chicago Bulls vs. Atlanta Hawks


King Taharqa

Recommended Posts

xqjiav.gif

(1) Chicago Bulls (59-20)

STARTING 5

3456.jpg

PG #1 Derrick Rose

6'3 190 lbs

Memphis '08

24.9 PPG 4.1 RPG 7.9 APG

1995.jpg

SG #6 Keith Bogans

6'5 215 lbs

Kentucky '03

4.3 PPG 1.8 RPG 37.6 3PT%

2429.jpg

SF #9 Luol Deng

6'9 220 lbs

Duke '04

17.5 PPG 7.3 RPG 5.8 RPG 2.8 APG 34.3 3PT%

1703.jpg

PF #5 Carlos Boozer

6'9 266 lbs

Duke '02

17.8 PPG 9.5 RPG 2.4 APG 52.0 FG%

3224.jpg

C #13 Joakim Noah

6'11 232 lbs

Florida '08

11.9 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.5 BPG 2.2 APG 52.6 FG%

BENCH

PG-CJ Watson

SG-Ronnie Brewer

SF-Kyle Korver

PF-Taj Gibson

C-Omer Asik

HEAD COACH

300297.jpg

Tom Thibodeau

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mi0uq0.gif

(5) Atlanta Hawks (44-38)

STARTING 5

4015.jpg

PG #0 Jeff Teague

6'2 180 lbs

Wake Forest '09

5.2 PPG 2.0 APG 37.5 3PT%

1007.jpg

SG #2 Joe Johnson

6'7 240 lbs

Arkansas '01

18.5 PPG 4.7 APG 4.1 RPG 80.3 FT%

2797.jpg

SF #24 Marvin Williams

6'9 240 lbs

North Carolina 6'05

10.5 PPG 4.9 RPG 84.9 FT% 33.6 3PT%

2411.jpg

PF #5 Josh "J-Smoove" Smith

6'9 240 lbs

Oak Hill Academy '04 (Mouth Of Wilson, VA)

16.7 PPG 8.7 RPG 3.4 APG 1.6 BPG 1.3 SPG 47.7 FG%

3213.jpg

C #15 Al Horford

6'10 245 lbs

Florida '08

14.2 PPG 9.8 RPG 2.3 APG 1.1 BPG 55.2 FG%

BENCH

PG/SG-Jamal Crawford

SF-Damien Wilkins

PF-Josh Powell

C-Jason Collins

C-Zaza Pachulia

HEAD COACH

larry_drew.jpg

Larry Drew

-----------------------------------

From MJ vs. Nique to Rose vs. Smith. This one is a nice matchup featuring the league MVP Derrick Rose. I doubted the Hawks in Rd 1, and they smashed Orlando, finally getting that monkey off their back. So surprisingly I'm gonna take the Hawks in 6 this series. I love Rose and think he's had a phenomenal year, but I think the Hawks beat them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

W/ Hinrich - Hawks in 6

W/Out Hinrich = Bulls in 5

Totally different team w/out Kirk. It showed on Thursday when he went out, the Hawks tried to throw that game away but barley held on.

Voted for the Hawks, cuz I want them to win. But sounds like Hinrich is out. Hawks NEED to take 1 of the first 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ATLANTA (AP)—Jeff Teague, it’s time to shine.

All he’ll have to do is hold his own against the NBA’s expected MVP, the guy who led the Chicago Bulls to more wins than any other team.

“It’s a tough situation,” Teague said Saturday, sitting at his locker after a lengthy practice with the Atlanta Hawks. “But these are the kind of moments you live for.”

The second-year guard is expected to take on a key role in the Eastern Conference semifinals after Kirk Hinrich went down in the closing minutes of a series-clinching win over Orlando with a severely strained hamstring.

Hinrich is unlikely to play in this round, meaning the Hawks have got to find a point guard who can run the offense and, most important, give Chicago star Derrick Rose some problems at the defensive end.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_ylt=AqGG_Zd9FOBOXfB1ylBBaAG8vLYF?slug=ap-hawks-bulls

I updated the Hawks starting lineup above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I appreciate the measured tone, truly. Hopefully we're at a point where we can dive a little deeper into the discussion. The observation about his footwork is fair in theory, but I'd also counter with 6'1" Brock Purdy recently admitting that he can't see his target on 40% of his throws due to the linemen in front of him. He just inked a massive deal, and while a lot of fans are understandably wondering what he's going to do with reduced weapons, "not seeing over the line" just doesn't seem to be that big of a disqualifier with his understanding of timing, leverage, and pre-snap reads (Aaron Rodgers is 6'2"... bet he's dealt with the same). Bryce is likely dealing with similar challenges due to his size, but it clearly doesn't mean it can't be managed at a high level. Also, I'm not convinced that "prototypical footwork" should be the end goal for a QB that isn't built like the prototype. What matters more is timing and rhythm with his receivers... which, as we've both noted, has been evolving as the WR room flips from vet stopgaps to rookies. He will need to improve there. That's not in dispute. What is in dispute is the impact that footwork is having on his ability to process and execute. The earlier suggestion that he's “hopping around” to see the field implies a frantic or panicked visual search, which just isn’t something we’ve seen reflected in either the film or any reliable breakdown. If it were as exaggerated as described, it would’ve become a meme-worthy moment (or at least been on SportsCenter's Not Top 10). Instead, we've seen a QB who, like many young passers, occasionally loses platform stability under pressure. That is something that's common and correctable, and again, not something that shows up with enough frequency to suggest it's an endemic flaw. It’s worth continuing to track, but to argue it's a defining issue requires stronger proof than anecdote. As for the "investments" made in the offense after drafting Bryce, I think that might be stretched a bit. Yes, we've used back-to-back firsts on WRs and signed guards to big contracts. But beyond that? Mingo (2nd) and Diontae (FA) are gone. Zavala (4th) was the worst-rated OL in the league his rookie year Sanders (4th) and Evans (5th) are mid-round TEs. Tremble was given a small contract extension but is said here to be at best a blocking TE2. Jimmy Horn Jr (6th) and Coker (UDFA) are the other WR investments Corbett + BC got one-year deals coming off of injury Cade Mays was tendered, but he was cut to start last season That's not some overwhelming infusion of elite talent. It's better, sure... but acting like it's some embarrassment of riches feels overstated. Expecting instant chemistry and impact from rookies and second-year guys while simultaneously mocking the idea of contending this year also feels a little... off? So far, what I've heard as your criteria boils down to red zone efficiency and intermediate passing to the sidelines? You mentioned moving the ball inside the 20s... I'd recommend 3rd down conversion rate, big-time throws, and turnover-worthy plays. For red zone play specifically, we could look at turnovers inside the 20. Incompletions in the red zone as well as intermediate sideline incompletions could provide an interesting starting point for film study. Hell, any of these would give us a more objective framework to work from if you're open to using them. Do any of them work for you?
    • I honestly can't stand the knee jerk emotional fans on both sides be they critical or homers, very much a wait and see try to remain objective as long as possible type fan.
    • See you guys had me wrong the other day I'm not a blind homer I just like more than a game sample size, that and with Morrow at fault for 4 goals i wanted to see if they could adjust and if rod the dud would play Boom. Well we got the answer.
×
×
  • Create New...