Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Your Questions About the pr0n Business Answered Here


YourManInAmsterdam

Recommended Posts

Okay, so we're having a rainy day here in Holland so I will be switching back and forth between the PS3 and the laptop. In other words, I'll be in the huddle a good bit today.

Anyway, if you've ever had a question about the porn business, now's the time to ask it. I'll answer it as best I can.

For the record, I don't claim to be *the* definitive source of information and I don't claim to know everything. But I have been involved in the business since 2001 so I am pretty educated.

So whatchoo wanna know?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, such things are not too far beyond the realm of possibility, sometimes. A wad of cash will get you into some pretty interesting places.

While commonplace in the U.K., it's not uncommon in the U.S. for adult performers to also escort on the side. You just have to do your research.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you a fluffier?

Nope. In fact, fluffers are more urban legend than anything, especially in the age of Viagra and the like.

The only times you might actually find fluffers being utilized are on the sets of large gangbangs or similar events where you have a lot of amateur male talent.

Even then, this is only partly done with the function of preparing the guys for their turn with the star of the show in mind. Otherwise, they're purely there for sake of having some content to break up the monotony of a couple of hundred, doughy, non-pros pumping away at some bored porn star.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love Russian/Eastern European porn. The girls look fantastic, and they seem to go by a different set of rules over there.

I've always found it to be kind of hit and miss, at least as far as the quality of the content in and of itself. The girls are usually gorgeous, though.

Most of what you see of this variety is being shot in Budapest and Prague, with only some of it actually being shot in Russia.

The only problem is that there does tend to be more of a criminal element involved in Eastern Europe and Russia when compared to Western Europe and the U.S. Various organized crime groups have their fingers in the pies out there and human trafficking/slavery does play a role in the porn scene. I don't think it's fair to say it's the rule, but it is happening. It's rather unfortunate and my company always does it's best to only buy from reputable studios working in the area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
    • Bro I don't mind debating you, but did you really have to write all that to get your point across.   This isn't Madden. If you have the #1 pick you literally control your own destiny. If nobody wants to trade which I have a hard time believing they won't then you obviously take the best QB.   I think we will have suitors. If that's Madden then so be it.
×
×
  • Create New...