Bucks looking to grab Diaw or TT or 10?

[BOBCATS_BALL!]

According to Bonnell's new blog we are talking to them.

The title is suppose to say for the tenth pick, sorry.

[bes628]

That would be about as perfect of a situation as possible.

[Proudiddy]

UPDATED this in my thread as well, but here you go.

Classic Bobcats:

From Bonnell:

There are definitely serious talks going on between the Charlotte Bobcats and Milwaukee Bucks. Don't know all the particulars yet, but it sounds like the Bobcats could end with the 10th pick and maybe send No. 19 to Milwaukee.

Don't know what veterans are involved, but here's a curiosity: Stephen Jackson and Corey Maggette have similar contract numbers, both in salary size and length of contracts. The Bucks would love to move Maggette. Don't know that the Bobcats would see him as an asset.

Horrible, self-mutilating, and redundant... you know, the usual Bobcats strategy.

[God]

Id do the 19 and Boris for the 10th but no good players like TT.

[Proudiddy]

Id do the 19 and Boris for the 10th but no good players like TT.

We shouldn't be giving up anything else if we're giving them 9mil in an expiring. We should get the 10th for that alone.

[HeatCheck]

We shouldn't be giving up anything else if we're giving them 9mil in an expiring. We should get the 10th for that alone.

I disagree. We'd atleast have to swap picks and give them the 19th. Then we'd have back to back picks. Diaw is not worth the 10th overall pick, even with that expiring.

[Proudiddy]

I disagree. We'd atleast have to swap picks and give them the 19th. Then we'd have back to back picks. Diaw is not worth the 10th overall pick, even with that expiring.

It depends, especially if the new CBA will have a hard cap.

Diaw's game itself isn't worth the 10 pick, but his contract is in that case. I've seen plenty similar deals in the past, we all have.

How many times as an NBA fan have you looked at a trade and thought "Wow, they actually did that?"

Problem is, we're always the team that "actually did that."

[HeatCheck]

I wouldn't be dissatisfied with Diaw + 19 for 10th overall

[Proudiddy]

I wouldn't be disatified with Diaw + 19 for 10th overall

I want the 10th pick, but I'm hoping to get Vucevic with the 19th, so I don't want to give it up.

[bes628]

I disagree. We'd atleast have to swap picks and give them the 19th. Then we'd have back to back picks. Diaw is not worth the 10th overall pick, even with that expiring.

We know he's not worth a 10, but maybe we can fool em :biggrin5:

[HeatCheck]

I want the 10th pick, but I'm hoping to get Vucevic with the 19th, so I don't want to give it up.

Yeah I guess if you are looking for Vucevic then 10 would be too high in terms of value. I wouldn't mind snagging him either. I just don't see Diaw alone for the 10th going down.

As long as we aren't trading Thomas.

[Its The Milk]

They might be wanting Biyombo at 10?

[Proudiddy]

Yeah I guess if you are looking for Vucevic then 10 would be too high in terms of value. I wouldn't mind snagging him either. I just don't see Diaw alone for the 10th going down.

As long as we aren't trading Thomas.

I'd be willing to give them TT for the 10th. I'm sure another team would be willing to take Diaw's expiring as well.

Another idea because Maggette's name keeps popping up, what if we took Maggette back with the 10th, and gave them Diaw?

That way we still keep the 19th and makes more sense for both sides because we'd be taking back an older player with a bad contract and giving them an expiring in its place. I don't want Maggette or his contract, but if we can get the 10th and keep the 19th out of it, I'd do it.

[HeatCheck]

They might be wanting Biyombo at 10?

I would not be opposed to that at all. BPA at 9, Biyombo at 10 (or vice versa it doesn't matter). I think that would be better than having Diaw and the 19th.