Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Sunday Ticket


TerriblePizza

Recommended Posts

Does this mean a one time 50 charge or a per/month deal?

Probably per month, thats around what it has cost before unless you call and negotiate a lower rate.

Edit: the article could be a little more clear. Definately going to call and find out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do you get in the game? At the start of the season, viewers who do not currently have access to DIRECTV will be able to subscribe to NFL SUNDAY TICKET at the season price of $339.95.

What an overpriced piece of poo package. You can get it free for a year if you subscribe to Direct TV.

When will the NFL allow games to be purchased ala carte? $7.99 per game and maybe I'll buy a dozen per year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah it kinda pisses me off that theyre luring new subscribers in by offering it for free. Best deal i can get is $30 a month instead of the usual $50. All these new subscribers are going to be pissed next year when they have to pay full price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What an overpriced piece of poo package. You can get it free for a year if you subscribe to Direct TV.

When will the NFL allow games to be purchased ala carte? $7.99 per game and maybe I'll buy a dozen per year.

Pretty sure you can buy a la carte games. We almost did it twice last year but the $30 price tag kept us from it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You could say that-- but if we don't need a starting OT this year, why would you draft a flawed one that is not going to play? (We are coming from different underlying assumptions and perspectives--I see your argument and don't disagree with the premise) Your thinking is based on the assumption that an OT for the future is more important than immediate needs at other positions, or that we can meet other needs in later rounds even if we take the OT in round 1.  I do not think there is but 1 OT worthy of a first-round grade---they are mocked based on need and demand--if we do not have a need for a starter right now, a team at 18 may grab a T that is the 33rd best player--worth it if you have no starting T, but not if you have a starter.  So just because they are mocked around the middle of the first it does not mean that the players are good values--teams get desperate.  QBs are a great example.  Simpson may be worth it in round 1 for the Cardinals, but not the Jets, because they have Geno Smith.  Sure, they will need a QB by next year, but taking Simpson is a reach. I do not see our need, with 2 starters (Walker and Moton) and another possibly returning by the end of the season enough to justify ranking OT over positions like Safety, Will LB--I do not think we replaced A Shawn Robinson (We gonna put a NT out there?  Wharton (280lbs)?  So do we reach in round 1 for a player who may not play much or do we get a Will LB that can cover?  A deep free safety?  A quality center? A playmaking TE?  A DT to replace Robinson?  A wide receiver to balance the secondary?  Long term, if the right player was there, you would be right.  Short term, OT is a luxury at this point, in my view.  
    • Put Huey P Newton on the helmet. With his AK. 
    • We arent switching. Evero is 3-4 to the core. Given how 3-4 has been a noticeable characteristic of top defenses recently and we have drafted and signed players fir it  I dont know why anyone would think that's a good idea 
×
×
  • Create New...