Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Walker had a triple-double tonight


Implied Volatility

Recommended Posts

Still would not consider him a good shooter, especially not something to aim for if I was expecting something similar out of MKG.

That's not the point.

We are talking about a top 3 pick, not someone who is a complimentary player. What this team needs is someone that will provide offense on a consistent basis. Someone who you can turn to in the final seconds. Not hating on MKG, just think the better fit lies with Barnes.

We're talking about 2 different styles of play. Barnes is the better shooter now like Ellington was then. MKG like henderson plays defense and rebound.

I ask again who is the better pro now? Henderson now avg. more points and get more playing time then Ellington. MKG while not being a better shooter does everything else better and will be more help on the floor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're talking about 2 different styles of play. Barnes is the better shooter now like Ellington was then. MKG like henderson plays defense and rebound.

I ask again who is the better pro now? Henderson now avg. more points and get more playing time then Ellington. MKG while not being a better shooter does everything else better and will be more help on the floor.

Barnes is more talented then MKG, But his talent gets over shadowed by marshal and zeller/henson.

UNC pretty much runs Barnes as a scorer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Barnes is more talented then MKG, But his talent gets over shadowed by marshal and zeller/henson.

UNC pretty much runs Barnes as a scorer.

So Davis, Jones, Lamb and Teague don't take away from MKG game?

I'm still not convinced that Barnes is more talented then MKG. He's a better shooter but MKG does everything else better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Barnes is more talented then MKG, But his talent gets over shadowed by marshal and zeller/henson.

UNC pretty much runs Barnes as a scorer.

worst argument ever considering Kentucky is the better team and MKG isn't even the best prospect on his team, whereas he would be on UNC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

worst argument ever considering Kentucky is the better team and MKG isn't even the best prospect on his team, whereas he would be on UNC

how is it a bad argument.... Marshal is the assist man, zeller and henson are both giant rebound/shot blockers UNC don't even crash boards if they are both in the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Davis, Jones, Lamb and Teague don't take away from MKG game?

I'm still not convinced that Barnes is more talented then MKG. He's a better shooter but MKG does everything else better.

Well barnes is probably staying at UNC, and MKG will probably be gone after this year since Kentucky is a pro factory, so the argument does not mean much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

worst argument ever considering Kentucky is the better team and MKG isn't even the best prospect on his team, whereas he would be on UNC

Going into the beginning of this month, they were similarly rated by NBA scouts with Barnes having a slight edge because of his scoring ability. Also Barnes averages a higher PER rating then MKG.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...