Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Draft Harrison Barnes, the Bobcats (Hornets) will in the NBA Title in 5 years


TheOracle

Recommended Posts

Yea, I got the Kobe vibe from Harrison, as well. I really hope we pick Barnes. I just feel like we haven't seen the best of him yet, plus we need scoring bad. I will be a little upset if we have to start Henderson again. He would be better off the bench. I just hope we don't take MKG

Henderson and Barnes' games compliment each other's. Hendo would be SG, Barnes would be SF. They would await Kyrie's arrival, LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Holy hell, if those combine numbers are accurate, he really could be the next Durant.

Is that sarcasm? Barnes benched 185lbs 15 times. Durant couldn't even lift it once, lol, so the two don't exactly compare. Who at the combine this year couldn't lift it once? That's who they should take, lol. <<sarcasm>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is that sarcasm? Barnes benched 185lbs 15 times. Durant couldn't even lift it once, lol, so the two don't exactly compare. Who at the combine this year couldn't lift it once? That's who they should take, lol. <<sarcasm>>

No sarcasm at all. His numbers are staggering.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally would like the 'Cats to draft Barnes if the traded to four or five (doubt he lasts).

His "deficiencies" are fixable..(creating off the dribble, ball handling, defense). I believe his ball handling and creation off the dribble will benefit from a larger NBA floor and better floor spacing. Accompany an NBA style offense with NBA coaching/workouts Barnes will at least develop the ability be more creative without the basketball (like rip hamilton) and develop some sort of post game for taking advantage of physical mismatches.

Off potential alone I believe he can be better than Luol Deng and a longtime starter at SF for the 'Cats.

All in all if Henderson can develop a reliable mid range jump shot and improve ball handling, I'm sure Barnes can. Barnes physical characteristics are incredibly promising much more than previously drafted UNC bobcats (felton, may).

Finally, I trust Cho.

In my untrained and noncredible opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uhhhhh, no. Maybe Rudy Gay

Rudy Gay wishes he could shoot it like Barnes. Rudy Gay should be a PIPPEN to someone's Jordan. That's his destined role. Too bad no one in the league has figured it out yet. Gay needs to be paired with someone like Joe Johnson.

SOMEONE LIKE.

Each would be better off for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, he'll leave to NY..right Oracle?

He's not Kemba Walker.

So now that Barnes is bigger, faster, more athletic, and can shoot it WAY better than Gilchrist, what is he missing that can't be acquired?

Oh yeah, the attitude that you all love...and the hyphenated last name.

If Barnes was business saavy, his nickname would be "BRYCE-JORDAN", then maybe you all would swoon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love this post from the SB site:

And on cue...

…everyone jumps on Barnes’ jock when the combine numbers merely confirm what most Carolina fans saw for the past 2 years. He was an NBA player forced to do a college internship and poorly utilized by his coach. He will be a beast in the NBA next year and every team who passes him by for the “winner” MKG will regret it royally.

averagebro - June 12, 2012 via mobile

Vince Carter was drafted FIFTH after Olowakandi, Bibby, LaFrentz and Jamison. Always remember that.

Wing players get held back ALL THE TIME at UNC. It's a PG & big man dominated system with wings as complementary players. Zeller was the #1 option Barnes' two years, not Barnes.

He knew his role. Most of you clearly don't think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Zeller was the #1 option Barnes' two years, not Barnes.

Quite impressive that Barnes was able to be the #2 option to Zeller while taking 3 more shots per game ;)

I wouldnt mind taking Barnes, but lets not get carried away. I was a bit surprised by his great numbers at the combine since he always had trouble getting to the basket at UNC, and even though he put up good scoring numbers he didnt do it efficiently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quite impressive that Barnes was able to be the #2 option to Zeller while taking 3 more shots per game ;)

I wouldnt mind taking Barnes, but lets not get carried away. I was a bit surprised by his great numbers at the combine since he always had trouble getting to the basket at UNC, and even though he put up good scoring numbers he didnt do it efficiently.

Not really. UNC ran a lot, and Zeller was less likely to be receiving the pass in transition than Barnes (or Bullock). Going inside was always the FIRST option in the halfcourt set, and Zeller was the primary target then, therefore he was the #1 option on offense.

Numbers don't tell the whole story. Anyone who watched UNC play, when they weren't running, knows that the ball was going to try to go inside to Zeller (or Henson) first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really. UNC ran a lot, and Zeller was less likely to be receiving the pass in transition than Barnes (or Bullock). Going inside was always the FIRST option in the halfcourt set, and Zeller was the primary target then, therefore he was the #1 option on offense.

Numbers don't tell the whole story. Anyone who watched UNC play, when they weren't running, knows that the ball was going to try to go inside to Zeller (or Henson) first.

Sure they passed it inside a lot, but Barnes got his fair share of isolations and opportunities on offense. I cant remember a wing player at UNC who played a bigger part of the offense than Barnes was (example: Vince Carter never shot more than 10 fga per game, Barnes was at 13)

For what its worth, people have tried to measure the plays run for each player on offense, its called usage % and Barnes was higher than Zeller both years (26 - 24, 28 - 25)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NEVER FORGET!!!!   Canales was on no one's radar. Tepper couldn't get anyone to come here. He was all in on Ben Johnson. Nobody wants to work with Tepper, however Canales tenure may prove important for the next guy. This guy still has no idea what he's doing. 
    • The 4th down play was poor execution by Chuba. He didn't want to get physical like Rico and cut North South to lean on his blocks from Tremble and Ekwonu for half a yard. Also, the 3rd down play before that Bryce audibled out to a QB run and almost got the 1st down was on Chuba for not knowing the play call leading to poor execution. You can see Chuba's confusion when Bryce had to realign him. Then Chuba thought he was getting the handoff and was slow to develop his double team on the DE with Tremble. Then Chuba hesitated on pushing the block and just ran to the sideline making Bryce have to loop around him. This pulled the DE away from Tremble forcing Chuba to chip on the DE late and leaving the safety as a free defender. Chuba was suppose to double down on the DE to let Tremble peel off to the safety. This allows Bryce to set up his run to the inside or outside after the safety commits. You can also see Tremble walk over to talk to Chuba after the play and Chuba shrugs which tells me he didn't know what to do. The audible would have worked on 3rd and the dive would have worked on 4th. The plays were good calls and drawn up well. The question is why was Chuba unprepared for those plays in two critical back to back plays? I like Chuba as a 1st down RB and passing downs, but I have always seen him lacking the power and vision to be a short yardage power back. Chuba didn't come prepared for the Saints game or he was thrown into a position at the 3 spot that he was never prepared for.
    • Yeah man, that was a catch. I like to imagine the game isn’t rigged but it’s well known sports betting is ruining the sport. Unfortunately, most coaches plan for 3 phases of the game. But there is really 4, offense, defense, special teams, and special occasions. on special occasions the refs can influence the game, leaving you in positions your actively planning to stay out of and how you respond in those special occasions make or break the game. Other times it’s other reasons. But I like to hope that the right team, or right player can extend past those types of setbacks and still find a way. anywho, probably a pipe dream. But it’s how I see it.
×
×
  • Create New...