Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do you think Cam's success had an impact on how people look at RG3?


Deebo

Recommended Posts

We'll see in a few years who turns out the better player. I'm not one for handing a Hall of Fame jacket to a guy with 6 wins on his resume but its very early in his career.

So I guess since wins are a not a team statistic, if the redskins only win 6 games this coming season then rg3 will be considered unproven and mediocre because he can't win more?

Just following your poo logic you've been flinging around here for ever since i can remember grits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will be very interested to see what RG3 does from under center and in a crowded pocket this year because there is no doubt that RG3 has all the tools to be an incredible pro but he has a low release point, is a little short, and was actually less patient in a crowded pocket than Cam was at Auburn.

I am pulling for him though because he has the potential to be very, very exciting.

Disagree about the low release point.

I don't understand the whole height issue, Griffin is average height for a QB, in fact he's actually taller then Aaron Rodgers and no one calls him a little short.

Also disagree about pocket presence.

Little known fact that during Griffin's freshmen year at Baylor they were under center alot.

As Briles evolved the offense they ran more and more shotgun.

So Griffin actually has more experience under center then most think.

About playing from within the pocket:

Because of his dual-threat capabilities, Griffin has often been compared to Cam Newton, but Griffin's college offense focused more on passing than Newton's. In Griffin's final season at Baylor, he attempted 110 fewer designed rushes than Newton did in his 2010 season at Auburn.

Additionally, Griffin passed on more than 84 percent of his drop-backs, which was a slightly higher percentage than Newton's at Auburn. Eighty-three percent of those passes came from inside the pocket, where Griffin completed more than three-quarters of his attempts.

As with Newton, scouts have questioned whether Griffin can make the transition from a spread offense to a pro-style system in which he would have to take snaps from under center. Newton took 95.7 percent of his snaps from the shotgun in Auburn's spread offense but was able to adapt fairly easily to a pro-style system in his first year in the NFL, completing a similar percentage of passes in shotgun and under center.

Last season, Griffin took 88 percent of his pass attempts from the shotgun, but his numbers from under center were actually better than his numbers from the shotgun.

http://espn.go.com/nfl/draft2012/story/_/page/NextLevel120419/doubters-drove-robert-griffin-iii-make-big-leap

Under Center/ Shotgun

75.0%/ 72.3% comp pct.

11.7/ 10.5 ypa

7-0 / 30-6 TD-INT

Don't get me wrong Griff has his flaws, but I don't think the ones mentioned are them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • it's pretty simple IMO.  The Tepper Panthers are the most unsuccessful professional sports in all of sports.  The problem isn't the posters here have changed.  The product dictates the atmosphere more than anything.  In reality, the daily convos about THE worst team in all of pro sports on a fanatics site....is going to feature harsh and critical convo.  Only one entity can actually change that.  It's the Carolina Panthers football team. 
    • Yes message boards will always include that sort of stuff… However, this place has been a cess pool since the team took Bryce Young over CJ Stroud. It becomes a problem when it is accepted and promoted, which it has been here (even by at least one mod). Many posters sole purpose on this board is to try to dunk on others for having different opinions. We just had one write a novella on how talking about Bryce Young’s game winning drives “needs to stop”…after a win. They don’t want real conversation. It “needs to stop”. There are many posters here who literally only show up after losses to dead thread and try to dunk on others about the QB (MRenshaw is an easy example). I really don’t see much of that happening the other way around. There’s too many people that would rather the team be bad so they can feel justified for constant doom and gloom and negative opinions. It’s been pointed out by many over the past couple years. This just isn’t a place to have football discussions anymore because of the constant hyperbole. If you don’t subscribe to “Bryce Young is the worst QB ever who can’t throw the ball further than 5 yards and is the reason why we lose any game we lose and doesn’t help in any game we win”, then you are labeled a Bryce Young Stan. 
    • if you believe he is watching every NFL game.....every week.....go right ahead.  I get it, he said something you like.  But that's like believing the talking heads on the ESPN shows are watching all the games.  You think Stephen A is watching the Panthers every Sunday too?  If Stephen A needs to go on First Take he certainly can pretend like he has watched every snap any player on the roster has taken lol.   No one is that isn't a Panther fan has been watching the 9-25 career go down every Sunday.  Or even a lot of Sunday's.  You know who knows more about Bryce Young than Long? The collective huddle.  What they are reviewing is stat sheets, highlights and in summaries.  It's an old formula lol.   
×
×
  • Create New...