Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Things I don't understand...


Marguide

Recommended Posts

Too often, Ron Rivera makes an in-game decision that just makes me shake my head. The latest example came in the 4th qtr of the Seahawks game. The situation was 3rd and 13, ball on our 26 yard line. Seattle gets called for ineligible man downfield.

Our choices: make Seattle repeat 3rd down with 18 yards to go to pick up a first down, or, turn down the penalty and they are looking at a 44 yard field goal attempt. We turned down the penalty.

This tells me that the coaches have no confidence in our ability to stop a 3rd and 13. It's a great down to send a blitz and maybe take them out of field goal range. Maybe Wilson throws an incompletion and they are then facing a 49 yard attempt (not a gimme by any means). Maybe they pick up 5 yards or so and the field goal is a bit shorter. But we choose to concede the field goal attempt by declining the penalty.

Over and over in damn near every game Rivera has made these sorts of decisions. He sends a strong signal that he doesn't trust the players to execute even when the odds are in their favor. This has been my biggest b!tch with RR. He almost always plays it soft and doesn't give us a chance to make something happen.

Frankly, it frustrates the hell out of me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, I probably would have taken the penalty. Hauschka or however you spell his name is a solid kicker. 44 yards isn't too tough for an experienced, solid kicker. If they throw an incomplete pass, 49 yards is a bit harder than 44. If they run for 5 or fewer yards (most likely scenario), it's at worst the same distance it was before the penalty. Worst case scenario, they pick up a touchdown/first down that leads to a touchdown and it's a 2 possession game (admittedly, a terrible scenario, but probably the least likely to be honest). Best case scenario, they commit a turnover or we get a sack or something that gets them 0 points and it's a FG to tie with plenty of time and better field position (second least likely scenario). If that happened, maybe we don't force it on 4th and 1 and tie the game. Who knows what would have happened then.

I did like the decision to go for it on 4th and 1 under those circumstances. Hated the playcall though. When your offense is having the day we were having, you keep it simple and try to pound it in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Given that the immediate impact we need at edge. We almost certainly address that in Free agency, not in the draft. Same with Linebacker, unless Styles or Allen is still there at 19. I think the same for OT.  What is the position that we could draft in the 1st round and get immediate help in the first is how im approaching their decision-making  I know ill get dragged for this, but im thinking they go DT in the first. A guy that can play right away and be a complement to D.Brown to wreak havoc at the LOS.   So unless a top tier LB is there, I think DT will be the move. 
    • I think people forget that by his last season Steve Smith had the ass and he played like it - and for no really good reason other than that other stars were emerging on the team and he didn't want to share the spot light.  He was more of a locker room distraction than he was worth. He went on to have great performances with the Ravens' but G-man made the right move allowing him to move on from here.  I personally think it was addition by subtraction and we don't have a super bowl run with Smith on the roster. Steve Smith remains a narcissist who I've never seen internalize his own culpability when it comes to his relationships with others - it's always somebody else's fault as to why he was forced to act like an asshole. This video is a product ad.  I'm cringed that either of these two Panther greats are party to it.
    • I think the ‘issue’ here is that we had two guys that clashed for several reasons. In some ways they were different, but in other ways they had a lot in common, and sadly they couldn’t see the forest for the trees. Sometimes when you have two people like that together they are either going to love or hate each other, and if it’s the latter, you need someone to mediate and hope the two individuals are capable of putting their differences aside for the common good. In this instance, they couldn’t find a way to move forwards together because I don’t think either guy wanted to play second fiddle to the other. This video basically said neither guy had the tools to bridge that gap and mend that fence, and perhaps also were unwilling to give an inch at that stage in their lives and careers. So a divorce, while unfortunate, was always likely. Do we win the Super Bowl with Smitty and Cam? Well, it’s one of life’s big what ifs for us Panthers fans.
×
×
  • Create New...