Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

syke's mock draft


BigSyke

Recommended Posts

Not bad but I think both Rhodes and definetely Fisher will be 1st rounders. Swearinger also will not get past the 4th. I'd be surprise if he even is still there in the 4th.

No way we're going after Finley and Cribbs. We having nothing to give for Finley and don't have the cap to carry his salary. And Cribbs isn't even a reliable no.2 WR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not bad but I think both Rhodes and definetely Fisher will be 1st rounders. Swearinger also will not get past the 4th. I'd be surprise if he even is still there in the 4th.

No way we're going after Finley and Cribbs. We having nothing to give for Finley and don't have the cap to carry his salary. And Cribbs isn't even a reliable no.2 WR.

Agreed 2nd team SEC Safety that was the co-leader of the defense that finished one of the best in the country. No way in hell he makes it that far down especially after the combine performance he'll turn in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like the point of trading back, I think it's a must this up coming draft. I'm going to see how Warmack do in the national championship and look at his combine numbers before I'm completely sold with him.

I like it to, but its not likely trading back at this point when you're out of a top 10 pick. Teams can just sit at their spot and still take the player they want. They dont have to trade up for someone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like it to, but its not likely trading back at this point when you're out of a top 10 pick. Teams can just sit at their spot and still take the player they want. They dont have to trade up for someone.

I think we should take the best offer available. Even if it's just picking up an extra 5th, or something like that. I do think getting an extra 4th would be pretty good. Yet just because it's a 1st round pick, I think we should at least get a 3rd. (Just based on the history of the draft, trade backs in the first round pick up decent picks)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we should take the best offer available. Even if it's just picking up an extra 5th, or something like that. I do think getting an extra 4th would be pretty good. Yet just because it's a 1st round pick, I think we should at least get a 3rd. (Just based on the history of the draft, trade backs in the first round pick up decent picks)

It would all depend on how far we're trading down. If we're moving down 3-4 spots and gets to add a 3rd, I'd take that all day. But I wouldn't drop back more than 5-6 spots for just a 4th or less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol well i tried guys

i went by alot of the round projections in walterfootball.com.

like xavier,fisher, dj.....just thinking maybe they might fall u never know like A. Rodgers(i think)

also with free agents i thought finnley would be good because newton did good with two TALL tight ends and cribbs was mainly for better field position. i mean carolina cant get finnley if he is the only free agent....damn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my second one

1.sheldon richardson dt

2.xavier rhodes cb

2.terrance williams wr

4.alvin bailey og

5.ray ray armstrong s

6.dustin hopkins k

That's cute, but Williams and Rhodes will establish themselves as first rounders by the combine. And like I keep saying whenever someone drafts Richardson, we won't be drafting a back up for Dwan so just wait until he resigns or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...