Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

2,067 Awesome

1 Follower

About Matthias

  • Rank
    Senior Member
  • Birthday 05/19/1985


  • Favorite NFL Team

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. This reminds me of the question of why doesn't the NFL increase roster sizes? They add on an extra game to the regular season, something I feel like fans weren't really asking for, but an increase in the amount of players you can have on the active roster is something that would be great for a couple of reasons. One, it would keep players healthy knowing you got guys to rotate, and two, you will have more surprise and breakout players taking advantage of opportunity. (Making the NFL more exciting to watch) Yet I guess the NFL doesn't want to do that because it means more players they would
  2. Shoot, for the right price, heck yeah. I would give one first next year and whatever small fry for him, but that's it. They would get no core players in return.
  3. Yep! I wanted him or the Notre Dame LT. Excellent draft!!
  4. If Sewell is not there, I would go with Pitts. If neither is there, I don't know. I'm not crazy about Slater, and if Fields is there, we should trade with a team that wants him.
  5. More hopeful, but I'll have to see who will be playing at LT. Lord help us if its Cam Erving.
  6. Is it normal for a rich athlete to have multiple women come to your home for a massage?
  7. Even when he plays, he's terrible. This is an awful signing in my book. Not a good measure of things to come. I really hope they don't intend for this guy to start next year.
  8. You pulled on my heartstrings. I'll give them Donte Jackson.
  9. I couldn't bring myself to do it. In terms of players, I would give them Shaq Thompson, Teddy (just to have an experienced QB going into the season), and Donte Jackson (if we can convince them he has potential). I would definitely keep those young defensive guys and Moore. Ultimately, they would have to be satisfied with the 1st rounders.
  10. I haven't read through this whole thread, but I'm seeing quite a few posts in favor of trading CMC. This surprises me. Shoot for me, the whole appeal of Watson being here in this offense goes away without CMC being here also. I know running backs are a dime a dozen, but dag, this is CMC we are talking about here. This ain't no scrub. We still haven't seen him at his best. This is also kind of funny to me personally because before we gave CMC his contract a year ago or so, I wasn't against trading him for I believe draft picks. Yet now that we paid him like a QB, I expect big results
  11. Sounds like a great trade if all the Texans want is two 1sts, two 2nds, and two defensive starters. I would keep Matos though.
  • Create New...