Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2013 LA DODGERS Thread

Kevin Greene

By Kevin Greene,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

C47 Newbie

C47

Posted
Posted

Alright Blue up 2 games to 1 and have a potential series close out game in LA Monday night.

Does Mattingly go with Nolasco or bring Kershaw back on 3 days rest?

 

Save Kershaw for a potential Game 5 or Game 1 of the NLCS.

 

At least fuggingly Mattingly didn't burn Jensen up for no reason as he did Game 1.

 

I think you have to stick with Nolasco and hope he gets the job done.  If he does then Kershaw and the rest of the rotation is reset for game one of the NLCS.  If he doesn't then you get Kershaw back on a normal five days of rest to shut it down in Atlanta.  Just the way I see it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kevin Greene Newbie

Kevin Greene

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Well if the Dodgers win tonight you gotta figure the NLCS will start the 11th as Game 5 would have been the 9th.

So on normal rest Kershaw wouldn't be available until Game 2.

If the Dodgers lose tonight and Greinke wins Game 5 we're looking at Hyun-jin Ryu starting Game 1 for the Blue.

Fug, they better win tonight. Fug Mattingly.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      Leave our mark.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Some of you act like one can't learn from experience over time. Just because you may not know what you're doing in 2018 doesn't mean that you don't know what you're doing in 2025. Frankly, you grow from experience, and success and excellence gives first-time applicants the hand probably 99.999% of the time.
    • frankw
      Delete this franchise

      By frankw · Posted

      It's an interesting topic of conversation as sports evolves. I think ultimately it would lead to a number of small market franchises folding though. Especially in the NBA where there are so many bad teams that have been bad for years and years in some cases already. But as it stands I think athlete pay draft or no draft aside has reached a point where we can and should realistically ask should they make that much compared to the average person. Now college athletes is a different conversation but even that reaches a breaking point. But we could go down the rabbit hole on this even further into overall entertainment and talk about actors making absurd sums too. In the end I think in sports the powers that be won't allow these changes to even be considered because it opens the door for so many other variables. But who knows how long sports like football will realistically be around after people like us pass on. We're only just now learning about things like CTE which the league and the sport in general will only be able to run away from for so long. As far as the NBA goes my understanding is viewership has been steadily going down for a number of reasons but one crucial aspect is key players missing so many games. The NBA has to figure that out regardless. Especially when considering fans who pay to see these athletes compete in person. But hey I guess let's just try to appreciate what we've got while it still exists in this form eh?
    • PanthersNCSU
      Delete this franchise

      By PanthersNCSU · Posted

      I can't see a world where the money goes down, but maybe your lottery odds are now your contract numbers you can offer.  Thunder? You can offer Flagg 4 years, 20 million.  Hornets? You can offer Flagg 4 years, 80 million.  Some form of a system where the money is still there, but so is the freedom of choice (on top of bad teams getting *some* competitive advantage to signing them). 
×
×
  • Create New...