Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Soccer '13-'14 season


Ja  Rhule

Recommended Posts

I think basically everyone knew City has a tendency to concede. They responded well though. Giroud missed a few clear chances that could have made it a different game. That one in the penalty area where he accidentally knocked it with his left boot was laughable.

 

Also- it wasn't a handball. Not every ball that touches any portion of a players arm is a handball, no matter how badly you may want that to be the case in the moment. It was an clear attempt to play the ball off his leg and it deflected into his armpit. Right call from the ref.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think basically everyone knew City has a tendency to concede. They responded well though. Giroud missed a few clear chances that could have made it a different game. That one in the penalty area where he accidentally knocked it with his left boot was laughable.

Also- it wasn't a handball. Not every ball that touches any portion of a players arm is a handball, no matter how badly you may want that to be the case in the moment. It was an clear attempt to play the ball off his leg and it deflected into his armpit. Right call from the ref.

It was clearly a handball, even commentator said it. When u use ur hand to make ur body bigger its a handball. It doesn't matter if it bounce if his leg, he used his hand to extend his body. Rules are rules. If he didn't extend the hand Walcott would have gotten that ball and be 1 on 1 with a goalie.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was clearly a handball, even commentator said it. When u use ur hand to make ur body bigger its a handball. If he didn't extend the hand Walcott would have gotten that ball.

 

In no match would that ever be called a penalty, unless Howard Webb was calling a United match at Old Trafford.

 

ibsaeLKj9SjFJS.gif

 

And look at the trajectory. If it hadn't hit his armpit, the ball clearly would have deflected back in the complete opposite direction that Walcott was traveling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hand extended blocking the ball on the pass to Walcott. If this is not a handball then I don't know what is. Both commentators called this a handball and said it should of been a penalty but I guess u know better.

It doesn't matter about trajectory. Handball is a handball. Plus Walcott was right behind him. It's impossible to say where this ball would go. And it clearly was not an armpit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12.9
DELIBERATE
HANDLING
The offense known as “handling the ball” involves deliberate contact with the ball by a player’s hand or arm (including fingertips, or outer shoulder). “Deliberate contact” means that the player could have avoided the touch but chose not to, that the player’s arms were not in a normal playing position at the time, or that the player deliberately continued an initially accidental contact for the purpose of gaining an unfair advantage.
 
 
Yea. He totally could have avoided that snap deflection off his thigh.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do not extend ur hands in the box when blocking the ball. Everybody knows that... So many penalties called every year when ball unintentionally hits someone hand. When u extend ur hands you make urself look bigger. Exactly what he did. You can try to prove ur point as much as u want but analysts and commentators said otherwise.

Also read the rule u posted... Players arms not in normal playing position.... His arms were spread wide... You call this his normal playing position? Lol

Thanks for proving everyone's point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do not extend ur hands in the box when blocking the ball. Everybody knows that... So many penalties called every year when ball unintentionally hits someone hand. When u extend ur hands you make urself look bigger. Exactly what he did. You can try to prove ur point as much as u want but analysts and commentators said otherwise.

Also read the rule u posted... Players arms not in normal playing position.... His arms were spread wide... You call this his normal playing position? Lol

Thanks for proving everyone's point.

Seriously? Find me an athlete who's normal hand position is anywhere else haha. It hit him in the armpit. Where is he supposed to put his armpit? Personally, mine doesn't really move very far.

If there is one thing watching sports has taught me, it's that commentators are always right. I guess the one who said "it could go either way and it clearly wasn't intentional" was wrong.

Sent from my SCH-I545 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously? Find me an athlete who's normal hand position is anywhere else haha. It hit him in the armpit. Where is he supposed to put his armpit? Personally, mine doesn't really move very far.

If there is one thing watching sports has taught me, it's that commentators are always right. I guess the one who said "it could go either way and it clearly wasn't intentional" was wrong.

Sent from my SCH-I545 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

You funny. Everyone wrong, you're right. Got it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good work "exposing" City in your 6-3 loss. What do you call what they did to you?

Changing subject eh?

But to answer your question, yes. It was a close game until failed penalty call and mistake by vermalen that gave pretty much free goal to City extending the score to 4-2. Arsenal players quit. The score does not show true game. You've been hating on Arsenal since you joined this forum so I expect nothing more for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Changing subject eh?

But to answer your question, yes. It was a close game until failed penalty call and mistake by vermalen that gave pretty much free goal to City extending the score to 4-2. Arsenal players quit.

 

I'm not going to continue arguing with an Arsenal supporter about that handball. Obviously you thought it was a handball, so that's fine. If it had happened to my club, I'm sure I'd have thought it was a handball as well. But it wasn't called, and just because one announcer agreed with you doesn't make you right. Take to twitter to find most people (outside the Emirates), including FA officials agree with the call.

 

I'd be much more upset about the "offsides" call on I believe Bendtner. I think he was on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not going to continue arguing with an Arsenal supporter about that handball. Obviously you thought it was a handball, so that's fine. If it had happened to my club, I'm sure I'd have thought it was a handball as well. But it wasn't called, and just because one announcer agreed with you doesn't make you right. Take to twitter to find most people (outside the Emirates), including FA officials agree with the call.

I'd be much more upset about the "offsides" call on I believe Bendtner. I think he was on.

I don't care about offside call. In my opinion that call was a game changer. It killed Arsenal momentum and David Silva scored another goal 30 seconds later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...