Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A complete misuse of Judaical Power


Jangler

Recommended Posts

MINNEAPOLIS -- A judge on Thursday blocked the NFL's plan to suspend Minnesota Vikings linemen Kevin Williams and Pat Williams for violating the league's anti-doping policy, a move their attorney said should let them start the season with camp beginning in just three weeks.

Hennepin County District Judge Gary Larson granted the players' request for a temporary restraining order that keeps the NFL from suspending them until their case is decided. The order also prohibits the league from subjecting them to extra drug testing.

The Williamses "would suffer a significant loss of playing time" without the restraining order, the judge wrote, and they have shown "some likelihood" of winning their lawsuit.

Peter Ginsberg, an attorney for the two players, called the order a "major victory" and said that at a minimum it should allow them to play for the early part of the upcoming season. He said it also protects them from stepped-up drug testing that they consider to be retaliation for standing up to the NFL.

More...

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4316261

I bet this Judge is a Viking fan. And IMO is misusing his power .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldn't the Saints players also be allowed to play?

It's a Minnesota State law they are dealing with so no.

The Minnesota Supreme Court Justice is an ex-Viking, not the State Judge.

According to the Minneapolis Star Tribune, Hennepin County Circuit Judge Gary Larson has ruled that defensive tackles Kevin and Pat Williams can continue to play football while their state-court claims against the NFL are pending.

In May, the NFL scored a partial victory against the pair, with the dismissal of federal claims challenging the imposition of the suspensions. But the federal court found that two claims arising under Minnesota state law could be pursued independently of the grievance procedure set forth in the Collective Bargaining Agreement between the league and the NFLPA.

Judge Larson, who's not the same Gary Larsen who once played for the Vikings, also ruled that the NFL is not permitted to subject the players to enhanced testing that follows a positive result until the case is resolved.

A hearing will be held on July 22 regarding a request from the league to stay the state-court action pending the outcome of the NFL's appeal of federal judge Paul Magnuson's decision to permit the Minnesota statutory claims to survive. If the league obtains a stay, there's a chance that the state-court action would be rendered moot, if the federal appeals court finds that a Collective Bargaining Agreement governed by federal labor law supersedes claims arising under a state statute.

Bottom line? The Williams Wall will stand tall to start the 2009 campaign, and there's a good chance that their status won't be finally resolved until after the coming season ends.

Maybe, in the end, the controversy will land on the desk of Minnesota Supreme Court Justice Alan Page, who is the same Alan Page who once played for the Vikings.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/07/09/williams-wall-cleared-to-play-while-litigation-is-pending/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The crux is here.

If the league obtains a stay, there's a chance that the state-court action would be rendered moot, if the federal appeals court finds that a Collective Bargaining Agreement governed by federal labor law supersedes claims arising under a state statute.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish these new wrinkles to all the suspension hoopla would just simmer down. I've already made my peace that we won't have our guys for the first 4 games, and I don't EVEN care if the Williams bros. get the long end of the stick here. poo, pay them some extra cash for breaking the same rules for all I care, just do it quietly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a question that maybe someone here can answer... if they tested positive for a banned substance, then how are they able to get a judge to block the suspension that has been given to them?

To put it simply, (And someone please correct me if I'm wrong, as I am not a specialist in on this topic), but the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) between the players Union and the owners is one of the few anti-trust agreements allowed by congress which actually violates the Free Trade Agreements laws set forth by congress, due to an agreement with the Players Union, the owners of the teams and congress.

Under the CBA, players and owners agree that a positive drug test can result in a play suspension.

But the problem, from how I see it, is that there is a law in Minn that says that without conclusive evidence, that an employee can not be terminated from employment, temporary or permanently, without conclusive evidence.

And that is what the struggle is over.

Maybe someone can explain it better than me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I just rewatched all the highlights from after Bryce being benched. The Bryce hate needs to calm down a little bit. He showed a ton of potential the back half of the year. Same with Legette. They both made great plays when it mattered and a few mistakes when it counted. If we didn’t have a historically awful defense last year we could have ended even a bit better. Going into a brand new season we should be optimistic at least before game one. 2015 no one expected to go anywhere and the team steam rolled the league. I’m not saying that will happen, but hopefully we made strides to improve on the end of last year. Bryce put both Super Bowl teams in a battle last year and if we had a better D we could have taken them both. So at least look forward to the season and not past the season until it at least begins. 
    • I’m not mad at Moehrig.  He’s great at what he does.  And to be honest, a lot of my favorite safeties in our history were box-first type guys - Maxie, Minter, Mike Mitchell, Chris Harris…  they’re first and foremost objective was to put people on their backs and coverage was secondary.  There is a place for that.  There is a definite need for that.  Physical guys that set the tone.  So cool, we have that in Moerhig. But what we have lacked for the vast majority of our existence is a true free safety that cleans everything up on the back end.  Sometimes they come in the form of a JOAT, like Peppers.  I think he would be a fantastic compliment to Moehrig’s strengths and weaknesses.  If we don’t go after him, I certainly hope Ransom is given the chance to grow and develop in real-time with real game reps, because what he did in preseason was very encouraging to see.  I hope he can grow into that roaming center fielder with a little bit of an edge to him as an enforcer as well.  He has the tools.  In the meantime, adding Peppers would only help.
    • Option 1 is most likely. Even if he kills it this year, it wouldn't be prudent to rush an extension for one good season. If you have to pay him more because you waited another year, then he earned it. And that's OK. Adjust accordingly. 
×
×
  • Create New...