Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would ESPN stop kissing Matt Ryan's butt, already!!!


HGG

Recommended Posts

Thats fine, let us go right under the radar

Screw the radar.

They normally show highlights based on who's leading what.

Clearly, they have man crushes on Matt Ryan.

he didn't even have a good game today.

How can you talk about a 10-13 game for 5-10 minutes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least Ryan is something worth talking about.

I hate the falcons but he is something special. A QB like him comes along only every other blue moon.

So much so that they'd be kissing his behind even if they were 0-14, right?

Sure they would.

These PISSANTS in the media love MANUFACTURING SUPERSTARS so that they can get high off of the smell of their jockstraps.

Matt Ryan was PATHETIC today. Threw some BONEHEADED INTERCEPTIONS in the red zone.

Nothing worth ESPN getting an erection over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Screw the radar.

They normally show highlights based on who's leading what.

Clearly, they have man crushes on Matt Ryan.

he didn't even have a good game today.

How can you talk about a 10-13 game for 5-10 minutes?

Lol... still... let us go under the radar. As long as we know what we're doing, you will be fine

Remember what happen before the season about the Saints??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still haven't seen one Panthers highlight on ESPN or NBC yet?

You'd think NBC would be trying to set up their game next week, but they are too busy wiping semen stains off of the stage because the Cowboys are playing tonight. Because of T.O. and Romo, not Jessica Simpson and the Cowboys Cheerleaders.

Big media markets. It's an aphrodisiac for talking heads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ideally Bryce and the other starters should get at least a full quarter and an argument could be made for 2 full quarters given how they've played early in the season the last few years.
    • A rookie that has never played a snap and a proven 1000K NFL WR are not going to be viewed the same in these type rankings.  And calling draft picks, lotto picks, isn't some new quip I just invented.  take the big 3 Hubbard, AT, insert whatever 3rd Panther you want vs Kamara, Hill, Olave.  Most football folks outside of Carolina are picking the Saints there IMO.    
    • You didn’t really address the point, just like you ignored the point about the RBs initially, and saying “they are all lotto picks” is just a really silly reduction because you could say that about literally any player rookie or vet every snap, every game, every year. It is well known that different positions have different hit rates, and I would argue different types of prospects within position groups as well, and that hit rates change the further down in the draft you go. Everybody knows QB is different and that, for example, first round OL have a really high success rate. Using your lotto ticket analogy…again…you are saying a lotto ticket with a 1 in 100 chance of hitting is the exact same thing as a lotto ticket with a 1 in 2 chance of hitting (this is an example, don’t take these odds literally). The point was he is no more of a lotto ticket than the 31yr old receiver coming off a major knee injury, and in my opinion he is better odds with a higher potential “jackpot”. Saying one player is an “lotto ticket” while another isn’t is just not sound logic. You have no idea who will break out, regress, get injured, etc. There are safer bets than others, that’s all. I don’t think Diggs is a safe bet and even if he was, weighing him over all of the Panthers WRs plus 2 1k rushers is just dumb. You can disagree if you want. The list is stupid.
×
×
  • Create New...