Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How big a part did Carolina have in which teams are playing in the Superbowl?


hepcat

Recommended Posts

Of the four teams that played in the conference championships this year, Carolina faced three in the regular season - Seattle, San Francisco, New England.  Of those three, they defeated two - San Francisco and New England.  Both New England and San Francisco finished 12-4.  In the NFC West, Seattle finished 13-3, won the division and had homefield advantage.  But if San Francisco had defeated Carolina, the 49ers would have won the division and been the #1 seed.  In the AFC, if New England had beat Carolina, they would have been the #1 seed.

 

I know the season is made up of 16 games and you could say the same thing about any other team that won/lost against these teams, but it's just fun to think about.  Essentially Carolina forced these two Superbowl contenders to go on the road in the playoffs, and I could go so far to say that cost them a chance at the Superbowl.  Who wants to go to Seattle during the playoffs?  Who wants to go face Peyton Manning in his house?  I'm sure Brady would have MUCH rather faced his arch-rival in the friendly confines of Foxboro.  

 

Just reflecting on a great season.  Can't wait for next year.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And those targets are mostly going to TMac, who will be a part of the FUTURE of the team. Did it remove the most reliable WR and Bryce's safety blanket? Absolutely. But it's also allowing him to build better chemistry with TMac, Stephens, Horn, Evans, etc. I am pumped to see Coker back and hopefully they can reignite that connection. 
    • It's the same thing that made Bryce the #1 overall pick. I've never seen such mass delusion about a football player before. Everyone convinced themselves that the fact that Bryce was below to severely below average in practically every physical attribute for an NFL QB just wouldn't matter because he has everything else you need and that'll more than make up for it. When has such an argument ever been made for an NFL prospect before? We watch prospects plummet every year because they run a couple tenths slower in the 40 time than expected. Smitty had everything you want in a receiver except he was 5'9" so he goes in the 3rd round. That's the way these things generally go. If you check a lot of boxes but leave some key ones unchecked you're not an elite prospect. With Bryce though, the physically limitations were always obvious so it gave more time to be able to build that into the equation and come up with reasons for why he'd be able to overcome it. Now we have all these same shortcomings having shone brightly on the NFL field and we STILL have people trying to convince themselves he'll be able to overcome it while ignoring that our past two wins and his improved play have come while riding the back of RB putting up GOAT RB production over the past two weeks. What changed wasn't Bryce. What changed is that Rico is playing out of his damn mind. Pretty much every NFL roster caliber QB can shine if he can get 200+ yards out of the RB behind him.
    • I'm gonna manifest that poo!
×
×
  • Create New...