Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Line Depth Could Be Tested Early on Panthers' Defense......


AKPantherFan

Recommended Posts

The Carolina Panthers have one backup defensive tackle with NFL experience, and he (Nick Hayden) has played in only two games with three career tackles.

As a result, the Panthers appear dangerously thin behind starters Damione Lewis and Maake Kemoeatui in a position group essential to stopping opponents from running the football.

Much like in boxing, one of the most effective ways to debilitate a defense in football is by attacking its midsection _ something Carolina opponents likely will try often this season.

In the first four games, the Panthers will face aggressive offenses with dangerous running backs _ Philadelphia (Brian Westbrook), Atlanta (Michael Turner), Dallas (Marion Barber and Felix Jones ), and Washington (Clinton Portis ).

This potential problem is even more glaring for Carolina than its lack of experienced offensive line depth, which we examined Wednesday.

While there rarely are substitutions on the offensive line without injuries, defensive linemen rotate frequently. It's helpful to have veteran backups like Darwin Walker, who filled that role for Carolina last season when he appeared in 10 games.

But even with Walker, the Panthers discovered how vulnerable they were without Kemoeatu and/or Lewis late last season. After the defense went 14 games without a missed start, Kemoeatu was unable to play Dec. 21 against the New York Giants, and Kemoeatu and Lewis had to sit out the regular-season finale at New Orleans.

The impact of their absences was minimal against a Saints team planning to pass, but not so the previous week against New York.

The Giants, the NFL's top rushing team, ran for 301 yards against the Panthers, the most Carolina has allowed in team history. New York had four of the 10 rushing plays of more than 20 yards the Panthers allowed all season.

During those final two weeks, the Panthers fell from 10th in the NFL in total defense to 18th.

Their No. 20 final ranking vs. the run was the worst in John Fox's seven seasons as coach.

The absence of experienced line depth can be traced at least in part to the $18 million defensive end Julius Peppers is counting against the salary cap, plus the new contracts given to other key veterans such as left tackle Jordan Gross, cornerback Chris Gamble, quarterback Jake Delhomme and kicker John Kasay.

Perhaps more than ever, the Panthers roster is weighted with "haves" and "have nots" in regard to salaries.

While it's possible _ perhaps likely _ Carolina will add a veteran defensive tackle before the regular season, it's not planning any additions before camp.

Hayden was a 2008 sixth -round pick. Team officials think he has the potential to be a steady backup, but he must prove it.

more.......

http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/yb/133547537

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...