why wasnt that a fumble?
#1
Posted 28 December 2008 - 07:39 PM
I noticed the refs took a long time reviewing it what was their excuse?
#2
Posted 28 December 2008 - 07:41 PM
#3
Posted 28 December 2008 - 07:42 PM
#4
Posted 28 December 2008 - 07:43 PM
#5
Posted 28 December 2008 - 07:43 PM
#6
Posted 28 December 2008 - 07:43 PM
#7
Posted 28 December 2008 - 07:44 PM
He had posession of the ball and took two steps. Was not even close.
#8
Posted 28 December 2008 - 07:44 PM
#9
Posted 28 December 2008 - 07:45 PM
Oh...my bad. It was a fumble however you look at it.The "football move" rule is gone, since 2007 I think. He just has to have control and maintain possession which it looked like he did.
#10
Posted 28 December 2008 - 07:47 PM
#11
Posted 28 December 2008 - 07:55 PM
You sure? I googled this and didn't see that being changed for 2007 or 2008. I believe that rule is still in effect.The "football move" rule is gone, since 2007 I think. He just has to have control and maintain possession which it looked like he did.
#12
Posted 28 December 2008 - 07:58 PM
You sure? I googled this and didn't see that being changed for 2007 or 2008. I believe that rule is still in effect.
No he is right, you have to come down with clear control of the football. No fumble, it was an incomplete pass.
#13
Posted 28 December 2008 - 08:01 PM
#14
Posted 28 December 2008 - 08:04 PM
#15
Posted 28 December 2008 - 08:04 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





