Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Now will we be a player In FA.


  • Please log in to reply
75 replies to this topic

#1 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,847 posts
  • LocationNonya

Posted 23 February 2010 - 01:26 PM

Since we won't pay Pep will we be a team that will be active during the FA period?

#2 Brooklyn Bully

Brooklyn Bully

    #1

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,037 posts

Posted 23 February 2010 - 01:26 PM

Nope.

#3 theyhateme45

theyhateme45

    360 GT = Shino45

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,371 posts

Posted 23 February 2010 - 01:30 PM

Not at all.... Just because we didn't pay Peppers, were still not gonna go out and make huge splashes.... People should stop thinking that because we let him go were gonna go sign top WR, top DL-Men ect....Not going to happen....

#4 CharlotteBeer.com

CharlotteBeer.com

    Resident Beer Nerd

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,700 posts

Posted 23 February 2010 - 01:34 PM

I think we will. For the past two years, Fox and Hurney have been on the hot seat and have at least attempted to bring in some impact players (moreso 2008 than last year).

I wouldn't be surprised if we went after a big name wide-receiver through free agency.

#5 Kurb

Kurb

    I hit it.

  • Administrators
  • 13,583 posts
  • LocationILM

Posted 23 February 2010 - 01:35 PM

I don't see a big contract without a labor deal.

Richardson is trying to pinch pennies with this 2011 year looming.

#6 Lumps

Lumps

    watch porn

  • ALL-PRO
  • 5,340 posts
  • LocationSouth Charlotte

Posted 23 February 2010 - 01:38 PM

I think we will. For the past two years, Fox and Hurney have been on the hot seat and have at least attempted to bring in some impact players (moreso 2008 than last year).

I wouldn't be surprised if we went after a big name wide-receiver through free agency.


I kind of felt the same, but you have to remember the lockout getting closer and closer. If we go after a big name, it's unlikely they would just want a throw away contract...

Just really hard to say with a lot of things changing.

#7 theyhateme45

theyhateme45

    360 GT = Shino45

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,371 posts

Posted 23 February 2010 - 01:39 PM

I don't see a big contract without a labor deal.

Richardson is trying to pinch pennies with this 2011 year looming.


Exactly he is practicing fiscal restraint and responsibility....

The top players will get into huge FA bidding wars and their value will be inflated... As we will find out today, Richardson is not going to over play... We will bring in some low key role players as we usually do.

#8 RedMage138

RedMage138

    YES!YES!YES!

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,533 posts

Posted 23 February 2010 - 01:43 PM

Lame duck coach and GM with the threat of a lockout in 2011 makes me think no. The same reason why we aren't going to rush to lock up more but we will 1st round tender him. It would be difficult to pass on Kampman but ultimately I think the team we have now will look a lot like the team that takes the field in 2010.

#9 Frash Brastard

Frash Brastard

    The Frashmaker

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,512 posts

Posted 23 February 2010 - 01:44 PM

absolutely not

#10 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,847 posts
  • LocationNonya

Posted 23 February 2010 - 01:48 PM

Well I hope all this fiscal restraint doesn't mean I have too pay too see a suckass team beacuse Richardson wants too be spot man on this labor issue. While JJ and Snyder build winning teams. I think we need too atleast use some of the money on replacements for Pep and WR help for smith and Moore. No matter what people think about Pep their is nobody on this team as it stands that can replace that kind of production and impact.

#11 The Link

The Link

    Satire Enthusiast

  • ALL-PRO
  • 3,005 posts

Posted 23 February 2010 - 01:52 PM

We won't sign anyone of value.

#12 unicar15

unicar15

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,685 posts

Posted 23 February 2010 - 01:53 PM

Personally, I think it depends on if they believe Matt Moore can get the job done. I don't see them making big deals in the offseason if they lack confidence in Moore to get us to the playoffs.

#13 theyhateme45

theyhateme45

    360 GT = Shino45

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,371 posts

Posted 23 February 2010 - 01:54 PM

Well I hope all this fiscal restraint doesn't mean I have too pay too see a suckass team beacuse Richardson wants too be spot man on this labor issue. While JJ and Snyder build winning teams. I think we need too atleast use some of the money on replacements for Pep and WR help for smith and Moore. No matter what people think about Pep their is nobody on this team as it stands that can replace that kind of production and impact.


It's a free country Bro... you don't have to pay... If you don't want to support then don't Watch.

Richardson is a good owner....

Correction.... While JJ and Snyder Continue to overspend for under acheiving teams

Whens the last time money bought them a superbowl, nfc championship, or even more than 1 playoff wins???

#14 Squirrel

Squirrel

    Drink a beer and relax

  • ALL-PRO
  • 12,742 posts

Posted 23 February 2010 - 01:54 PM

I still think they will give Jake the boot now with Peppers not coming back. Use that cap space we are saving to get Jake off the books for 2011.

#15 The Link

The Link

    Satire Enthusiast

  • ALL-PRO
  • 3,005 posts

Posted 23 February 2010 - 01:57 PM

I still think they will give Jake the boot now with Peppers not coming back. Use that cap space we are saving to get Jake off the books for 2011.


That would be ideal, but I think Jake is retained and he starts next year.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com