Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

Hmmmm...... Wait a sec!


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
18 replies to this topic

#13 jloh

jloh

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-January 09
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 264
  • Reputation: 13
HUDDLER

Posted 20 September 2010 - 08:46 AM

....zod is daddy 'round here....all hail zod....

#14 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,761
  • Reputation: 7,985
Moderators

Posted 20 September 2010 - 09:00 AM

ummm....really anyone watching matt moore yesterday couldn't honestly feel good about him. i just don't see how that is possible. there is no room for optimism left, imo. zod has nothing to do with that. it was apparent yesterday that moore isn't who we had hoped he was.

the offense looked better with clausen than it has all year. that was also very apparent. clausen comes not just with more hype, but with more to bring to the table. it's obvious the team wants him for the future, with or without fox. it was only a matter of time before clausen was going to get the job. might as well give it to him now.

thanks for thinking this was your special idea, though. may you find whatever praise you are looking here for that helps make your life complete.

#15 bleys

bleys

    Simple and Plain

  • Joined: 28-November 08
  • posts: 15,611
  • Reputation: 1,638
SUPPORTER

Posted 20 September 2010 - 09:03 AM

ummm....really anyone watching matt moore yesterday couldn't honestly feel good about him. i just don't see how that is possible. there is no room for optimism left, imo. zod has nothing to do with that. it was apparent yesterday that moore isn't who we had hoped he was.

the offense looked better with clausen than it has all year. that was also very apparent. clausen comes not just with more hype, but with more to bring to the table. it's obvious the team wants him for the future, with or without fox. it was only a matter of time before clausen was going to get the job. might as well give it to him now.

thanks for thinking this was your special idea, though. may you find whatever praise you are looking here for that helps make your life complete.


this.. I'm pretty sure people were posting about Clausen before Zod put a stamp on it. lol

#16 TarPanther9180

TarPanther9180

    Ready for football

  • Joined: 05-August 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,805
  • Reputation: 1
HUDDLER

Posted 20 September 2010 - 09:04 AM

It's because everyone hates NFL Executives

#17 Captroop

Captroop

    Pronounced, "Cat Poop"

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,133
  • Reputation: 1,795
HUDDLER

Posted 20 September 2010 - 09:05 AM

So basically, NFL Executive is the guy who goes to the comments boards and writes "F1RST!" And now he is getting his panties in a wad because people aren't giving him imaginary credit?

#18 chknwing

chknwing

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 04-May 09
  • posts: 8,669
  • Reputation: 6,744
SUPPORTER

Posted 20 September 2010 - 09:12 AM

the difference in saying it then and now, is Moores play. Moore had done nothing up until the past 2 games to show he could not qb this team. So your assumption about Moore was not based on facts or his actions.

#19 The_Cannon

The_Cannon

    Tickle Me & Rub My Belly!

  • Joined: 23-April 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,322
  • Reputation: 142
HUDDLER

Posted 20 September 2010 - 09:20 AM

I think the main reason people were more hesitant to pull Delhomme is because of his history with us. I said in another post yesterday I like Moore, he seems like a good guy and after his games last season I wanted him to come in this season and light it up, but if he plays bad and get benched I'm all for pulling him because he hasn't connected with us. He has never seemed like our "starter" or our "leader."

With Jake even when I was sitting in the freezing cold at that Arizona game I had full faith in that guy because I KNEW what he was capable of, he took us to the Super Bowl he consistently gave us wins he was advertised our tasty Bojangles Chicken and Biscuits he was the face of our franchise. Most people here had loyalty to Jake, Jake was our guy and that why I and alot of others hesitated to call for Jakes head (at least for the first 3-4 games of last year). With Matt its just not the same, he gave us hope at the end of last season but I don't think he's connected with us he always has seemed kind of disposable.