Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

rodeo

"Pro-family"

30 posts in this topic

you said yourself it wasn't fair, that they should've been admitted.

If you think it's ok for law to be arbitrarily unfair to people then this is an entirely different conversation.

you yourself rail against activist judges, if you don't want courts overturning laws based on their beliefs, and you want a passive government that doesn't legislate these sort of things then the only way to solve them is through civil court, through the marketplace, through "damages."

Unfortunately this is the only way the law will be changed.

The laws are what they are...But, out of human decency, they should've been admitted. If the woman dying had been her HUSBAND then she woulda had no problem.

Again, slippery slope with the gay marriage thing...Civil unions maybe, but outright legalization of same-sex marriages and the Pandora's Box is open.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The laws are what they are...But, out of human decency, they should've been admitted. If the woman dying had been her HUSBAND then she woulda had no problem.

Again, slippery slope with the gay marriage thing...Civil unions maybe, but outright legalization of same-sex marriages and the Pandora's Box is open.

you don't believe that the majority of americans can separate homosexuality and beastiality? If that's true we certainly do need the government to take care of us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not the states or the country's business who gets married to who. It needs to be left up to the church. If the church is ok with it, which some are, then so be it. Why do people care so god damn much if a man wants to marry another man? It's none of your business.

On topic, it's pathetic what the hospital did.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not the states or the country's business who gets married to who. It needs to be left up to the church. If the church is ok with it, which some are, then so be it. Why do people care so god damn much if a man wants to marry another man? It's none of your business.

On topic, it's pathetic what the hospital did.

reason!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So people that believe it should be illegal for a gay couple to adopt a child and believe the lifestyle in and of itself is immoral should be tormented by people who can't follow the rules so they sue to get their way?

just because you "believe" something should be legal or illegal doesn't mean you can make your own law about it.

in miami gay adoption is legal. the kids were legally her children.

the people not following the rules were the hospital. they illegally denied access to the woman's medical power of attorney holder and legal children. any "torment" they face they brought on themselves through their illegal action.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is part of why I think gay people should be allowed to marry. My mom will say things to me like OH THEY JUST WANT TO PASS THEIR ESTATES DOWN W/O PROBATE and to that, I say so the eff what if that is why some of them get married. Did Anna Nicole Smith marry for love? YEAH RIGHT. Are hetero couples that much "better" at marriage or always marry for so much "better" reasons that we can be sanctimonious about it? Nope.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is part of why I think gay people should be allowed to marry. My mom will say things to me like OH THEY JUST WANT TO PASS THEIR ESTATES DOWN W/O PROBATE and to that, I say so the eff what if that is why some of them get married. Did Anna Nicole Smith marry for love? YEAH RIGHT. Are hetero couples that much "better" at marriage or always marry for so much "better" reasons that we can be sanctimonious about it? Nope.

Civil Unions! YES! Marriage! NO! Again, Pandora's Box....When people want to start screaming for multiple spouses, or even to marry an animal...As sick as that is...You can't deny one group while granting preference to another.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can't deny one group while granting preference to another.

you mean like denying gays and granting preference to straights?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Civil Unions! YES! Marriage! NO! Again, Pandora's Box....When people want to start screaming for multiple spouses, or even to marry an animal...As sick as that is...You can't deny one group while granting preference to another.

you don't believe that the majority of americans can separate homosexuality and beastiality? If that's true we certainly do need the government to take care of us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Civil Unions! YES! Marriage! NO! Again, Pandora's Box....When people want to start screaming for multiple spouses, or even to marry an animal...As sick as that is...You can't deny one group while granting preference to another.

and plus, then you'd have to give civil unions to donkeys. Are you pro-donkey-civil union?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites