Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

fjblair

More Fun Cam Newton Stuff

110 posts in this topic

you sure sound neutral to me.:rolleyes:

Just because I am neutral doesn't mean I don't have a perspective.

There are a few Cam lovers who actually bring good, supporting evidence. I have read a few good pro-Cam threads...wish there were more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just because I am neutral doesn't mean I don't have a perspective.

There are a few Cam lovers who actually bring good, supporting evidence. I have read a few good pro-Cam threads...wish there were more.

that sounds a little bit better;)

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just because I am neutral doesn't mean I don't have a perspective.

There are a few Cam lovers who actually bring good, supporting evidence. I have read a few good pro-Cam threads...wish there were more.

Why bother?

We've been over the FACTUAL components of Newton beyond any reasonable discussion. In every case, either Mr. Scot, TRD, or mav, and a few others go all out with every internet forum tactic to discredit the facts, portray them negatively, or simply ignore them.

Newton's stock has skyrocketed since Luck announced his decision to stay in school. Without fail, after every test of Cam's ability, his draft stock shot up. The haters lost the the argument that he's not worthy of consideration as #1 overall, they are just in denial about it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pretty much described Jimmy Clausen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@blackcatgrowl RAWR!

LOL WTF?

Besides the fact that whatever you said is completely wrong, where do you throw Mav in there?

That was a really confusing post, and that says a lot coming from you because I've grown accustomed to your posts not making any sense at all.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@blackcatgrowl RAWR!

LOL WTF?

Besides the fact that whatever you said is completely wrong, where do you throw Mav in there?

That was a really confusing post, and that says a lot coming from you because I've grown accustomed to your posts not making any sense at all.

Mav likes to act like he's neutral, but he's really anti-Cam.

Aside from that, what's left to talk about with Cam? Anything I point out about how good he is, you'll just turn around and say its wrong or deflect to a supposed negative.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mav likes to act like he's neutral, but he's really anti-Cam.

Aside from that, what's left to talk about with Cam? Anything I point out about how good he is, you'll just turn around and say its wrong or deflect to a supposed negative.

It's funny how you say supposed negative when literally everyone and their mother who is respected in the NFL community and draft community agree that they are actual negatives about his game and his only real positives are his upside.

I'm not going to debate them with you again because it's well documented but it's crazy to me how you don't even recognize that he has real negatives about him.

Even the biggest "anti-Cam" guys have recognized that he could have a high ceiling but the "pro-Cam" guys often refuse to acknowledge that he has any negatives at all.

It really shows who are the biased people and who are the logical people

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Every QB, including Andrew Luck, has negatives, but something tells me that most of you would be perfectly willing to overlook his negatives, and assume they will be easily fixed because he's so much smarter than Newton.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's funny how you say supposed negative when literally everyone and their mother who is respected in the NFL community and draft community agree that they are actual negatives about his game and his only real positives are his upside.

I'm not going to debate them with you again because it's well documented but it's crazy to me how you don't even recognize that he has real negatives about him.

Even the biggest "anti-Cam" guys have recognized that he could have a high ceiling but the "pro-Cam" guys often refuse to acknowledge that he has any negatives at all.

It really shows who are the biased people and who are the logical people

Yes, it's logical to reject statistics and factual data. Sure is!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites