Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Pelosi wants gun registration

51 posts in this topic

Posted

The better to round you up and and dispose of you easier...

http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Books/story?id=7271110&page=1

TOTUS approves but veils intent....wouldn't veto.

Long article...but you can watch the video where she makes the statement. (-1:06 mark)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Well, I can tell you with absolute certainty that G5 didn't bother to watch the segment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I'll oppose any efforts to legislate registration....and without watching the video, I know that Pelosi and her ilk definitely approve of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Well, I can tell you with absolute certainty that G5 didn't bother to watch the segment.

I can tell you with absolute certainty that I did.

How else would I know what mark it was that she made the statement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Don't know, but if you actually watched it, you may have remembered to mention her saying that that is only for assault weapons (not "gun registration") and that she also specifically said that there is no interest in "taking guns away" or eroding states rights on the subject, or that Congress could only be involved in this for the DC area, and that all parties would have to find "common ground".

Unless of course, she is lying about everything except the one thing you desperately want to believe. Which sounds just like you, or someone that would post "LOOK AT 1:06" on a nutjob cut and paste message board.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Don't know, but if you actually watched it, you may have remembered to mention her saying that that is only for assault weapons (not "gun registration") and that she also specifically said that there is no interest in "taking guns away" or eroding states rights on the subject, or that Congress could only be involved in this for the DC area, and that all parties would have to find "common ground".

Unless of course, she is lying about everything except the one thing you desperately want to believe. Which sounds just like you, or someone that would post "LOOK AT 1:06" on a nutjob cut and paste message board.

You even run to Pelosi's defense...WOW!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Don't know, but if you actually watched it, you may have remembered to mention her saying that that is only for assault weapons (not "gun registration") and that she also specifically said that there is no interest in "taking guns away" or eroding states rights on the subject, or that Congress could only be involved in this for the DC area, and that all parties would have to find "common ground".

Unless of course, she is lying about everything except the one thing you desperately want to believe. Which sounds just like you, or someone that would post "LOOK AT 1:06" on a nutjob cut and paste message board.

Dude...watch the video...it's 5:40 long. She talks about Obama's trip...nuke statements...and she applies NO qualifier to ONLY registering "assault weapons". Are you putting words in her mouth? There was discussion on reinstating the AW ban and the ball is in her court...but she goes on after that to discuss gun registration.

"the Supreme Court has ruled in a very...uh...in a direction that gives more opportunity for people to have guns. (CWG...what USSC ruling of late has even addressed the AWB?) We never denied that right. We don't want to take their guns away. We want them registered. We don't want them crossing state lines."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Do you guys really think guns or ammo will be banned? I'm pro-gun myself but this kind of rhetoric doesn't concern me. I could see some stricter laws within large city limits, but the outrage would be way too much is there was a straight up ban.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

She can register my guns WHEN SHE PRIES THEM FROM MY COLD DEAD HANDS!!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Banned no.

Restrictions to effectively ban them through fines/registrations/licenses/taxation yes.

It'd be akin to saying yes...you have free speech...but we're taxing paper to the point you can't afford to buy it, setting parameters you have to meet in order to write on paper, attend government-run classes to teach you proper writing methods on where/when you can/cannot write, and if taxation on paper doesn't pass...we'll just tax ink, yadda yadda yadda...you get the point.

I fully believe that people like Pelosi will do anything in their power to remove them if they had the chance, but they just understand it would be political suicide...right now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

It was clear that the Assault Weapons Ban was what was being discussed. Anyways, you have to register your dog, your car, your boat, so I don't understand what - other than giving you a reason to cry - gun registration makes so evil. Certainly it will make it easier to trace and return stolen guns, or backtrack them if a crime is committed with one. That sure seems a lot less "invasive" than say, warrantless wiretapping?

But since you point to what she says as what she believes, you now know that your guns will not be taken away, and you can move on to other opportunities to put up funny teleprompter jokes.

And I guess I have to tell you this because you may not get it. Pelosi is the Representative of the most liberal, hippie, commie area in the US. It's like her job to want to freaking ban toenail clippers, and yet here she sounds pretty reasonable. Based on what this freakishly outrageous socialist says being the most radical statement you are prone to hear about guns, I'd say the continuation of your gun ownership rights are not in much danger.

I don't know anything about Pelosi, don't get to vote for her, but I have no problem calling out a swiftboating when I see it. She does enough wacky things without having to make them up....I thought.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

She is 3rd in line for the presidency...she is the leader of the house democrats...she is your leader...other than Obama/Biden.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites