Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

D-Will or Stewart trade?

127 posts in this topic

Posted

Trade Stewart and next years first to Cleveland to move up and draft Claiborne?? possibility.

If we do that I will flip out. Dwill and a 2nd next year tops

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Trade Williams before Stewart.

But I thought Tolbert was a fullback.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Well don't that just stir the pot up good?

Lets be honest, we needed a new angle for the constant D'Will-Stewart bitchfest.

Thanks Kevin.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Tolbert plays both FB/RB. He's not half bad, but something would be up if we get him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

How the hell do you guys figure we would more likely get rid of Stewart than Deangelo?

what is this? I dont even-

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

How the hell do you guys figure we would get rid of Stewart before Deangelo?

what is this? I dont even-

Well we certainly can't trade DeAngelo...no one's gonna touch that contract. Stewart on the other hand has a market.

I like Tolbert, but not if we overpay and ESPECIALLY not if it means we lose Stewart. I can't imagine Stewart being third on the RB payroll.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

this makes no scene

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Well we certainly can't trade DeAngelo...no one's gonna touch that contract. Stewart on the other hand has a market.

I like Tolbert, but not if we overpay and ESPECIALLY not if it means we lose Stewart. I can't imagine Stewart being third on the RB payroll.

Dude, Stewart is our running back of the future. Dwill can get cut for all I care.

Since when do we NEED to trade either one anyways? Am I missing something?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Dude, Stewart is our running back of the future. Dwill can get cut for all I care.

Well that may be your thoughts but it certainly isn't happening...we made a large commitment to him and he just had a productive season, highly doubtful we just cut him for nothing. I agree Stewart is the best option for us long term, but I think the odds of him leaving the team are greater than DeAngelo's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

We use 2 RB sets. Move Brokel to the #3 TE spot, move him to FB when we need him. Then we use all 3 of our RBs in rotation. It can work...that's basically what we've been doing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Since when do we NEED to trade either one anyways? Am I missing something?

Maybe you're not talking to me here, but if so, that's not what I was getting at. You just made the comment about getting rid of one over the other, so naturally a trade made the most sense as far as "getting rid" of one of them because, at this point with their levels of productivity, neither of them should just be cut outright.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Well that may be your thoughts but it certainly isn't happening...we made a large commitment to him and he just had a productive season, highly doubtful we just cut him for nothing. I agree Stewart is the best option for us long term, but I think the odds of him leaving the team are greater than DeAngelo's.

My point is, if we are ever in a position where we have to get rid of one of them, the team would more likely cut Deangelo before they trade Stewart. You don't trade a 24 year old top-tier running back who hasn't peaked and is as versatile and important to our offense as Stewart in favor of keeping our 30 year old one-dimensional running back or getting draft picks.

Maybe you're not talking to me here, but if so, that's not what I was getting at. You just made the comment about getting rid of one over the other, so naturally a trade made the most sense as far as "getting rid" of one of them because, at this point with their levels of productivity, neither of them should just be cut outright.

nah, not talking to you there. I just got that vibe from reading this thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites