comeoooooon training camp!
50 replies to this topic
#32
pantherclaw
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 4,793 posts
Wise Ass
- LocationGalveston
Posted 12 April 2012 - 10:48 AM
Were ya drumk when ya came up with this?
#33
Dxterity
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 3,028 posts
The Thread Killer
- LocationConnecticut
Posted 12 April 2012 - 10:59 AM
gtfo
#34
Argus Plexus
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 4,516 posts
Super Kami Guru
- LocationCape Fear Area
Posted 12 April 2012 - 11:00 AM
Die
#35
Guest_fug_*
Guest_fug_*
-
- Guests
Posted 12 April 2012 - 11:48 AM
I was thinking the same thing this morning, like we need our only healthy LB. Dumb fug.
#36
panthers55
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 14,071 posts
Starting all over again
- LocationAt the lake
Posted 12 April 2012 - 12:02 PM
We need at least 4 or 5 starting quality linebackers who can come in for a few games or longer if we have injuries plus we need several for depth. Anderson is the cheapest of the 3 starting linebackers and is a great value. We have waited for years for him to develop to the point of being a good starter. Tel me again why we would trade him????
#38
CRA
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 19,498 posts
Senior Member
Posted 12 April 2012 - 12:12 PM
I can't recall a single poster claiming Beason can't comeback from that injury. Some question how long it will take him to reach the level he once was at....Yea and the ones that think he is human understand that people can rehab an injury and comeback. Then there are people like yourself. Also I put it was a crazy idea and it is for the fact that Davis probably won't recover after 3 surgeries.
#39
panthers55
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 14,071 posts
Starting all over again
- LocationAt the lake
Posted 12 April 2012 - 12:19 PM
I can't recall a single poster claiming Beason can't comeback from that injury. Some question how long it will take him to reach the level he once was at....
Stop trying to reason with him. The strategy he uses is to ascribe extreme positions to anyone who has doubts about Beason's rehab as if that fortifies his position. Any reasonable poster hopes for the best but knows it is foolhardy not to prepare for the worst. Otherwise we end up with a possible reprise of last season.
#40
Delhommey
-
- Moderators
-
- 10,278 posts
Moderator
Posted 12 April 2012 - 12:23 PM
Assumption creep at its finest.
#41
Feldman9000
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 1,038 posts
IT IS WHAT IT IS
- LocationGreenville, SC
Posted 12 April 2012 - 12:49 PM
I stopped reading at Theory
#42
scarface
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 2,278 posts
Senior Member
- LocationEastern NC
Posted 12 April 2012 - 01:22 PM
Theory I came up with this morning: with all this chatter about us liking Luke Kuechly so much, is there a chance they're thinking of trading James Anderson? If we take Kuechly, it would make no sense unless we moved one of the guys there currently and the only one with real trade value we would be willing to part with is Anderson for the right price. I would hate this, but does anyone else feel this theory makes sense?
No. Kuechly is insurance for Thomas Davis, not so they can trade Anderson.
#43
TheOracle
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 2,457 posts
Know-It-All
Posted 12 April 2012 - 03:14 PM
Lets trade the only LB that started all 16 games for us last year.
Exactly. Of the top 3, he's the only one who's body hasn't yet be ruined. You can't expect Davis OR BEASON to ever last a full season, again.
#44
rico6
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 6,401 posts
Shit.
Posted 12 April 2012 - 04:19 PM
Because we're not Linebacker depleted enough already.
#45
lineal89
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 2,188 posts
CPP "Carolina Panther Phann"
- LocationSC
Posted 12 April 2012 - 04:23 PM
Why on earth would you want to trade the only healthy starting LB on the team....Theory I came up with this morning: with all this chatter about us liking Luke Kuechly so much, is there a chance they're thinking of trading James Anderson? If we take Kuechly, it would make no sense unless we moved one of the guys there currently and the only one with real trade value we would be willing to part with is Anderson for the right price. I would hate this, but does anyone else feel this theory makes sense?
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
