Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Turner the Burner overweight?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
36 replies to this topic

#1 L-TownCat

L-TownCat

    Baptized In The Blood Of Saints

  • Joined: 27-June 11
  • posts: 5,931
  • Reputation: 4,126
SUPPORTER

Posted 22 June 2012 - 10:03 AM

Just read this article about our old friend down 85 south. Could this be another sign of things to come for us sooner than later?

Posted by Josh Alper on June 22, 2012, 10:07 AM EDT

"Getty Images
Running back Michael Turner is in line for the smallest workload of his NFL career this season, something that the Falcons have explained as being about keeping him as fresh as possible down the stretch.

The Falcons haven’t mentioned his weight as part of the equation for spreading the backfield work, but it has come up elsewhere in Atlanta. On sports radio and elsewhere, Turner has been called overweight. In a video interview with the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Turner denied those claims and said that he weighs the same as he has throughout his career.

Turner has always been on the beefier side of things. When you combine that with his severe fades toward the end of the last two seasons, it makes sense that people would wonder if he was out of shape. Regardless of the time of the season, though, Turner has long struggled to produce against strong run defenses and piled up big numbers against weaker opposition.

Perhaps that will be remedied by a better balance with other backs or with a stronger passing attack, something new offensive coordinator Dirk Koetter has been charged with bringing to town. For the Falcons to take the next step up the ladder, one or the other will have to result in a more effective run game regardless of Turner’s weight."

#2 TheGreatestOfAllTimeCam

TheGreatestOfAllTimeCam

    Cam Nut Hugger

  • Joined: 27-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,637
  • Reputation: 953
HUDDLER

Posted 22 June 2012 - 10:11 AM

He sure as hell is overweight

#3 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,897
  • Reputation: 7,796
Moderators

Posted 22 June 2012 - 10:23 AM

he's been overrated for a couple years.

#4 nosuchthingasapanther

nosuchthingasapanther

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 5,771
  • Reputation: 2,308
SUPPORTER

Posted 22 June 2012 - 10:44 AM

nothing new. turner's been on the heavy side for years.

never understood how he picked up the nickname burner in the first place. he's been shifty and has quick spurts, but he's never been fast.

#5 The Huddler

The Huddler

    #BringHardyBack

  • Joined: 17-June 11
  • posts: 6,086
  • Reputation: 3,939
SUPPORTER

Posted 22 June 2012 - 10:44 AM

is butt is huge

#6 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 44,812
  • Reputation: 13,353
SUPPORTER

Posted 22 June 2012 - 10:45 AM

Maybe they'll change his nickname to Turner the Cheeseburger.

#7 jtnc

jtnc

    Resident Asshole

  • Joined: 28-November 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 13,637
  • Reputation: 3,571
HUDDLER

Posted 22 June 2012 - 10:46 AM

is butt is huge

Literally though.

#8 The Huddler

The Huddler

    #BringHardyBack

  • Joined: 17-June 11
  • posts: 6,086
  • Reputation: 3,939
SUPPORTER

Posted 22 June 2012 - 10:47 AM

Im serious

#9 csx

csx

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 31-December 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,751
  • Reputation: 2,221
HUDDLER

Posted 22 June 2012 - 10:51 AM

he's been overrated for a couple years.


I don't know how anyone with over over 1300 yards and over 10 tds the past two seasons can be overrated. That's like 3rd in the NFL over that time frame and he gets fairly little attention for it.

#10 jtnc

jtnc

    Resident Asshole

  • Joined: 28-November 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 13,637
  • Reputation: 3,571
HUDDLER

Posted 22 June 2012 - 11:04 AM

I don't know how anyone with over over 1300 yards and over 10 tds the past two seasons can be overrated. That's like 3rd in the NFL over that time frame and he gets fairly little attention for it.


True, because Ryan cannot succeed without a running game. He relies on play-action too much.