Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

g5jamz

He knew

37 posts in this topic

Dem lies better than Pub lies.

Got it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't care who knew what and when. It's not a political issue, it's a security/intelligence issue. All I care about is whatever went wrong is fixed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dem lies better than Pub lies.

Got it

or it just costs less

*fake outrage!!!!!!*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't care who knew what and when. It's not a political issue, it's a security/intelligence issue. All I care about is whatever went wrong is fixed.

i care about inflaming a situation in an effort to save face. perhaps that's not what's going on here... but i am curious.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

not to distract your point but i honestly don't see how al gore could've possibly been a worse president than bush.

Gore scared the crap out of me. He believed he was the smartest man on the planet and was never capable of asking others for their suggestions.

Having one all knowing leader (at least in his own mind) would be dangerous.

After hearing his rantings on global warming and then the excuses for why Obama had a poor first debate (the elevation in Colorado), you should realize that the many was intellectually brilliant, but half off his rocker.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gore scared the crap out of me. He believed he was the smartest man on the planet and was never capable of asking others for their suggestions.

Having one all knowing leader (at least in his own mind) would be dangerous.

After hearing his rantings on global warming and then the excuses for why Obama had a poor first debate (the elevation in Colorado), you should realize that the many was intellectually brilliant, but half off his rocker.

perhaps... but it took a special kind of person to make the wrong decision as consistently as bush did.

i honestly don't think that even under the worst case scenario he could've been as bad as bush.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm....

http://www.mediaite.com/online/helpers-of-the-global-jihad-claim-responsibility-for-terror-attacks-in-norway/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I mean worst case scenario is they knew it was a terrorist attack and they lied to keep it under wraps for a couple of weeks.

It's bad but it's not "Lie in order to invade another country, borrow trillions of dollars we don't have, and kill hundreds of thousands of people" bad.

i totally agree. i just don't get the suppression. if it was that straight forward and no intent of invasion was going to happen, just say here is the deal and go from there. i think there would be significantly less fall out than there is now. any delay info when you know just escalates uncertainty and gives alex jones types convulsions something is afoot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So the fact that this administration may have intentionally lied to and mislead the public about this does not bother you?

If this had been a Republican President, you and the media would be calling for him to be shot.

The hypocrisy by some of you is amazing.

lol i bet you think GWB and rumsfeld aren't war criminals

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites