Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

The frail and scrawny Teddy Bridgewater

teddy Bridgewater

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
72 replies to this topic

#16 ajax4132

ajax4132

    HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,432 posts

Posted 17 February 2014 - 08:32 PM

Bridgewater is no where near as good as Luck.

Neither are on Cam's level.

His pocket presence and accuracy are on par with Lucks probably better IMO

 

Bridgewater is also considered a genius by everyone he works with

 

Luck beats Bridgewater in mobility dues to size

 

I



#17 Evengelion

Evengelion

    HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,450 posts

Posted 17 February 2014 - 09:41 PM

His pocket presence and accuracy are on par with Lucks probably better IMO

 

Bridgewater is also considered a genius by everyone he works with

 

Luck beats Bridgewater in mobility dues to size

 

I

I won't bet on that. Luck officially ran specifically a 4.669 at the Combine:

 

http://insider.espn....ayer/_/id/28325

 

Bridgewater will run in the 4.5ish range.

 

Luck has nothing on Bridgewater, other than a neck beard.



#18 Guest_Dark Knight_*

Guest_Dark Knight_*
  • Guests

Posted 17 February 2014 - 11:35 PM

On what category? Accuracy? Pocket awareness? Mobility?


Doesn't matter to you because Luck isn't black.

#19 Evengelion

Evengelion

    HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,450 posts

Posted 18 February 2014 - 10:22 AM

Doesn't matter to you because Luck isn't black.

It mattered when you said "Bridgewater is no where near as good as Luck", right? Now when you're asked to explain yourself it suddenly doesn't matter? What is in your thinking when you said Luck is better than TB? Why is it important to you that Luck is better than him when they're not fighting for draft position. Bridgewater hasn't even played a snap in the NFL but is automatically doomed to dwell in the shadow of the Luck greatness. Why is that?. Just like Cam, RG3, Wilson, Winston, etc.(you get the point). Right now I can't even say TB is even better than Blaine Gabbert because he hasn't competed against similar competition. If ever I were to utter such nonsense, I promise you, it would be for an ulterior motive. What is your ulterior motive?



#20 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • ALL-PRO
  • 42,230 posts
  • LocationSC

Posted 18 February 2014 - 10:35 AM

Doesn't matter to you because Luck isn't black.


FYI: The poster you're talking to is a teenage kid who's obsessed with hating Andrew Luck. It's the only thing he's even capable of talking about. He doesn't seem to have the brain capacity to discuss anything else at any length. I think whenever someone says something good about Luck, it makes him cry (or throw a temper tantrum).

Basically, he'll look for excuses to talk about Andrew Luck in any thread or try to find some way to turn the conversation to that topic, no matter what the topic is. You see this same MO in about every thread he joins.

Trying to talk football with him is pretty much a waste of time. He knows next to nothing, but like a lot of kids his age he thinks he knows a lot. It's your time to waste, of course, so have at it if you want. You'd probably pick up on this yourself pretty quickly anyway, but I just thought I'd warn ya what you're getting into.

He'll probably respond to this post with about six paragraphs explaining why it's okay to hate Luck, how terrible it is that anyone ever says anything good about him and suggesting stupid theories about how Oliver Luck controls all sports media.

#21 Guest_Dark Knight_*

Guest_Dark Knight_*
  • Guests

Posted 18 February 2014 - 11:51 AM

FYI: The poster you're talking to is a teenage kid who's obsessed with hating Andrew Luck. It's the only thing he's even capable of talking about. He doesn't seem to have the brain capacity to discuss anything else at any length. I think whenever someone says something good about Luck, it makes him cry (or throw a temper tantrum).

Basically, he'll look for excuses to talk about Andrew Luck in any thread or try to find some way to turn the conversation to that topic, no matter what the topic is. You see this same MO in about every thread he joins.

Trying to talk football with him is pretty much a waste of time. He knows next to nothing, but like a lot of kids his age he thinks he knows a lot. It's your time to waste, of course, so have at it if you want. You'd probably pick up on this yourself pretty quickly anyway, but I just thought I'd warn ya what you're getting into.

He'll probably respond to this post with about six paragraphs explaining why it's okay to hate Luck, how terrible it is that anyone ever says anything good about him and suggesting stupid theories about how Oliver Luck controls all sports media.


I don't think he hates Luck specifically, just white people in general.

Anytime Luck, Dalton, Stafford, Manziel, etc are mentioned he gives a speech on why they suck.

Anytime Newton, Griffin, Wilson, Kaepernick, Bridgewater, Winston, etc are mentioned he gives a speech on why they are a future HOFer & the future of football.

#22 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • ALL-PRO
  • 42,230 posts
  • LocationSC

Posted 18 February 2014 - 12:00 PM

I don't think he hates Luck specifically, just white people in general.

Anytime Luck, Dalton, Stafford, Manziel, etc are mentioned he gives a speech on why they suck.

Anytime Newton, Griffin, Wilson, Kaepernick, Bridgewater, Winston, etc are mentioned he gives a speech on why they are a future HOFer & the future of football.

 

Valid.  Could be Luck is just the leading example there.

 

I actually think Manziel will be a bust as a pro.  On the flipside, Bridgewater has all the tools to be great if he can take the pounding (RG3 is an example of just how big a factor that can be).



#23 Evengelion

Evengelion

    HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,450 posts

Posted 19 February 2014 - 11:55 AM

I don't think he hates Luck specifically, just white people in general.

Anytime Luck, Dalton, Stafford, Manziel, etc are mentioned he gives a speech on why they suck.

Anytime Newton, Griffin, Wilson, Kaepernick, Bridgewater, Winston, etc are mentioned he gives a speech on why they are a future HOFer & the future of football.

First of all, I never go outta my way to make any comments about Stafford and Dalton. Secondly, of all the white QBs in the league you take offense in me not liking the way the media is selling us Andrew Luck? You don't find it odd how they create dumb topics just so they can highlight his name at the top. I, personally, would feel kind of embarrassed if they were doing this with Cam. They created a freaking topic in which he would be the only eligible QB and publish it. You don't  find anything weird about that? I love football and I especially love basketball, I just don't like when outsiders with an agenda try to poison my pass time. If I wanted to hear about left wing and right wing crap I would follow fox network, but I don't. If Luck is gifted show me he throw for 4000 and rush for 700. Don't want anymore goddamn article about a guy who threw 7 INTs in 2 playoff games.

 

By the way, speaking of Newton, Griffin, Wilson, Kaepernick, Bridgewater, and Winston, etc. that's an impressive list of young stars. Didn't notice that until you listed them. Don't remember the last time the NFL piled up such an A list of young QBs. Each is talented, marketable, and have a face to them that a helmet can't hide. Certain 'je ne cais quoi'. Reminds me of how the NBA is structured. Lots of superstar power. Maybe Andrew Luck does need an article titled "Which young QB have the top neck beard."

 

And, no. I don't hate anybody. Some of my favorite porns have women of a different race than me.



#24 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • ALL-PRO
  • 42,230 posts
  • LocationSC

Posted 19 February 2014 - 06:16 PM

First of all, I never go outta my way to make any comments about Stafford and Dalton. Secondly, of all the white QBs in the league you take offense in me not liking the way the media is selling us Andrew Luck? You don't find it odd how they create dumb topics just so they can highlight his name at the top. I, personally, would feel kind of embarrassed if they were doing this with Cam. They created a freaking topic in which he would be the only eligible QB and publish it. You don't  find anything weird about that? I love football and I especially love basketball, I just don't like when outsiders with an agenda try to poison my pass time. If I wanted to hear about left wing and right wing crap I would follow fox network, but I don't. If Luck is gifted show me he throw for 4000 and rush for 700. Don't want anymore goddamn article about a guy who threw 7 INTs in 2 playoff games.

 

By the way, speaking of Newton, Griffin, Wilson, Kaepernick, Bridgewater, and Winston, etc. that's an impressive list of young stars. Didn't notice that until you listed them. Don't remember the last time the NFL piled up such an A list of young QBs. Each is talented, marketable, and have a face to them that a helmet can't hide. Certain 'je ne cais quoi'. Reminds me of how the NBA is structured. Lots of superstar power. Maybe Andrew Luck does need an article titled "Which young QB have the top neck beard."

 

And, no. I don't hate anybody. Some of my favorite porns have women of a different race than me.

 

Yeah...You did pretty much nothing to dispute what he said.

 

Here's the thing, kid.  That great media conspiracy you keep talking about?  It only exists inside the bad wiring of your brain.

 

Luck's dad Oliver is the athletic director of West Virginia University.  Not Alabama, not USC, not any other major college.  The athletic director of West Virginia University is not someone who has the power to manipulate the national media.  The idea is so utterly stupid it's laughable.

 

Bottom Line: You're obsessed with hating Luck, and Batman may well be right that you hate white quarterbacks in general seeing as you never say a positive thing about any of them while defending dips--ts like Colin Kaepernick for no good reason.  Deny it all you want.  Everybody knows it.  And because of your blind hatred you subscribe to ridiculous theories that make you look like an idiot.

 

Let it go.  Talk about something else.  As it is now you've pretty much got nothing to say other than "i hate Andrew Luck", and it's pretty boring to read that same moronic crap over and over again.



#25 Swan

Swan

    Executive

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 885 posts
  • LocationAustin, TX

Posted 19 February 2014 - 06:59 PM

you guys take this poo too seriously



#26 TheRed

TheRed

    California Dreamin'

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,450 posts
  • LocationCharlotte, NC

Posted 19 February 2014 - 07:49 PM

We've got our own Andrew Luck defense force on the Carolina Huddle.



#27 Evengelion

Evengelion

    HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,450 posts

Posted 19 February 2014 - 08:09 PM

Yeah...You did pretty much nothing to dispute what he said.

 

Here's the thing, kid.  That great media conspiracy you keep talking about?  It only exists inside the bad wiring of your brain.

 

Luck's dad Oliver is the athletic director of West Virginia University.  Not Alabama, not USC, not any other major college.  The athletic director of West Virginia University is not someone who has the power to manipulate the national media.  The idea is so utterly stupid it's laughable.

 

Bottom Line: You're obsessed with hating Luck, and Batman may well be right that you hate white quarterbacks in general seeing as you never say a positive thing about any of them while defending dips--ts like Colin Kaepernick for no good reason.  Deny it all you want.  Everybody knows it.  And because of your blind hatred you subscribe to ridiculous theories that make you look like an idiot.

 

Let it go.  Talk about something else.  As it is now you've pretty much got nothing to say other than "i hate Andrew Luck", and it's pretty boring to read that same moronic crap over and over again.

Not saying Oliver have much weight in the media. But he's in a high profile job in the sports realm. How many minorities you know are Atheltic Directors? None. Right? That's how high profile his job is. Being the AD of one of the top football program in the country doesn't hurt. Selling the quarterback royalty thing ala the Mannings while his father is very relevant in the sport is quite obvious. It's annoying the length they go through to sell that. No room for that in the modern game.

 

I'm not sure if you know this but the media make or break quarterbacks. If the media wants America to believe Tom B. is a horrible QB they can. Just like they sold many that Cam was a monster that couldn't be controlled until this year. They're doing their best to sell us that Luck is legendary. Don't act like you don't know.

 



#28 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • ALL-PRO
  • 42,230 posts
  • LocationSC

Posted 19 February 2014 - 10:28 PM

Not saying Oliver have much weight in the media. But he's in a high profile job in the sports realm. How many minorities you know are Atheltic Directors? None. Right? That's how high profile his job is. Being the AD of one of the top football program in the country doesn't hurt. Selling the quarterback royalty thing ala the Mannings while his father is very relevant in the sport is quite obvious. It's annoying the length they go through to sell that. No room for that in the modern game.

 

I'm not sure if you know this but the media make or break quarterbacks. If the media wants America to believe Tom B. is a horrible QB they can. Just like they sold many that Cam was a monster that couldn't be controlled until this year. They're doing their best to sell us that Luck is legendary. Don't act like you don't know.

 

Media doesn't make or break quarterbacks.  Performance does. 

 

And if you did a little research, you'd find that as of 2007 there were 17 minority athletic directors in NCAA Division I-A (an all time high at that point) so unless all of them have lost their jobs and nobody else has been hired, yes they exist.

 

You've proven Batman was right about you, and that you do indeed need help.
 



#29 Evengelion

Evengelion

    HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,450 posts

Posted 19 February 2014 - 10:31 PM

Cam Newton officially ran 4.56:

 

http://insider.espn....ayer/_/id/27308

 

That's like so much more faster than 4.667, which is what Luck ran. Just wanna put that out there.



#30 Evengelion

Evengelion

    HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,450 posts

Posted 19 February 2014 - 10:45 PM

Media doesn't make or break quarterbacks.  Performance does. 

 

And if you did a little research, you'd find that as of 2007 there were 17 minority athletic directors in NCAA Division I-A, so unless all of them have lost their jobs and nobody else has been hired, yes they exist.

 

You've proven Batman was right about you, and that you do indeed need help.
 

The media can easily credit the OL, WRs, and the defense for the team's success. As a panther fan I thought you'd know more about that because Cam has been a victim of that for 3 goddamn years and you know it. You're hypocrite if you say that's not true.

 

You lost the point I was trying to make. That's only 17 of them out of multiple hundred schools. I wouldn't expect you'd understand where I was coming from. I didn't literally mean there is an absent of a single one of them. They're so rare it's almost like not having any at all. I'm sure you're content with that fact since you're so open minded and such a new age thinker and all.
 




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com