Jump to content


Member Since 24 Nov 2008
Offline Last Active Yesterday, 10:01 PM

Topics I've Started

Honest Company Slogans

28 January 2014 - 05:15 PM

Prepare to chuckle.




Tried to post a couple as images in the thread but they showed up way too big. Just click the damn link.





Jon Richardson's Will Calls for Sale of His Stake in Panthers

08 January 2014 - 02:01 AM

This article from the Charlotte Observer was just posted:



Jon Richardson’s will calls for sale of his Panthers stake
Posted: Tuesday, Jan. 07, 2014

Jon Richardson, who died in July and was son of Carolina Panthers majority owner Jerry Richardson, said in his will that he wanted his portion of the team sold after his death, according to documents filed in Mecklenburg County Superior Court.

The Richardson family, led by majority owner Jerry Richardson, owns 47 percent of the partnership that owns the team and stadium, according to documents leaked to the website Deadspin last year. Jon Richardson’s share is around 7 percent of the family’s share, based on the leaked documents.

Jerome Johnson Richardson Jr., Jerry Richardson’s oldest son, died at age 53 after battling cancer for 13 years. He served as the president of what is now known as Bank of America Stadium from the team’s inception until his resignation in 2009.

Jon Richardson’s will, which he signed in 2006, provides no details on his stake in the team or why he wanted it sold. A Panthers spokesman declined to comment.

The sale of the stake would be a shift for a Panthers ownership group that has changed little since Jerry Richardson landed the franchise in 1993.

The team’s ownership gained renewed attention last year when the city of Charlotte agreed to contribute $87.5 million toward a $125 million planned stadium renovation. The team outlined the first phase of its plans on Tuesday.

During negotiations, the team told the city the franchise would be sold within two years of Jerry Richardson’s death because of tax implications. In return for the city’s financial commitment, the team agreed to be “tethered” to Charlotte for as long as 10 years.

Richardson is 77 and had a heart transplant in 2009. This season, his team has made the playoffs for the first time since 2008 and is set to play the San Francisco 49ers on Sunday.

The Panthers franchise has a complex ownership structure, according to the documents leaked to Deadspin.

An entity called Panthers GP LLC owns the Richardson family’s 47 percent stake in the team. Of that entity, Jerry Richardson owns 64 percent, and his wife, Rosalind, and three children, including Jon, each hold 6.6 percent. The remaining 10 percent of Panthers GP is held by an entity called PFF Inc., of which Jerry Richardson owns 71 percent and his wife and three children each hold 7.3 percent.

An inventory of Jon Richardson’s estate filed in Mecklenburg County Superior Court in November says PFF has not been valued yet. It does not mention Panthers GP.

It wouldn’t be the first time a Panthers owner sold off an ownership interest.

Read the rest here: http://www.charlotte...-calls-for.html


It's an interesting development, but I don't think it'll affect ownership rights too drastically. Jon owned 6.6 percent of the family's share which works out to about 3.1 percent of the total share. The Richardsons will still be majority owners with a stake around 44%. Jerry's succession plan calls for the team to be sold due to tax implications and I'm sure Jon was thinking along the same lines.


I can't believe these discussions still occur, but earlier I had to convince a fellow fan that the team won't be leaving Charlotte soon. Worst case that can't happen for another 10 years and that's really a doomsday scenario. As the article points out, the team is tied to the city for a decade as a result of the city contributing to the renovation plans--the first phase of which was revealed earlier. The rest of the ownership is made up of 12 others, many of whom have ties to Charlotte or North Carolina including Erskine Bowles, the Belks and the Levines. It would take an out and out mutiny for this team to be relocated.



Conan, Kevin Hart and Ice Cube share an epic ride

17 December 2013 - 10:27 PM

Had me rolling for 9 minutes straight.


Could the bye week be a bad thing?

16 December 2013 - 02:35 PM

It seems to be universally accepted that the Panthers landing the number 2 overall seed would be a great thing. The home field advantage I'm all for. It'd be great to have a playoff game in Charlotte because the city really gets behind the team when we're in those positions. I can't be the only one though who might be slightly worried about the effect a bye week might have on a team. They say the championship teams are playing their best ball at this time of year and we'll know where the Panthers stand in that regard on Sunday. But I know this team does not have a history of performing well coming off of a bye and more importantly, when you're rolling, why would you want to take a week off and risk coming out "rusty?" The playoffs are not the time to be rusty.

Granted, byes have their distinct advantages. Notably, giving players time to get healthy, giving coaches more time to gameplan and ensuring at least an appearance in the divisional round, a necessary achievement if we hope to reach the SB.


Just curious where everyone falls on this issue.

A tactical false start?

20 November 2013 - 11:12 AM

From the Panthers blurb on the new SBN power rankings:



4. Carolina Panthers

Going for it on fourth down? That's fine and good, but not really special. Taking a tactical false start so that speed burner Ted Ginn would have room to catch a game-winning 25-yard TD? That's some advanced stuff, there - Ron Rivera is playing chess while everyone else plays checkers.  Of course, it helps that Cam Newton is playing great ball and making poised, accurate throws while the Panthers defense mauls just about everyone they see. Stevan Ridley's goal line fumble might have been a key to their victory, but to the victors go the spoils - and the coveted #4 spot in the Power Rankings. (Last Week: 6)


Did anyone else see this? Is there a team source that indicated as much? I watched the post-game presser and his press conference yesterday and don't remember this being mentioned. Nor do I remember reading it elsewhere. I've heard of taking penalties to give your kicker a better angle or your punter more room, but never this. If confirmed, RR truly is playing chess.


All I remember thinking at the time Bell got the penalty was "Fuging Byron Bell."

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com