Has to be the least attractive right? A lack of talent, a meddling owner, and a shitty location.
They're probably the most talented team out of all of the options, but that also means they'll have the least amount of flexibility. If you take this job you're stuck with Zeke, Dak, etc plus Jerry Jones. Would have to deal with the pressure to win immediatly and the media talking about you constantly, which could be a positive or a negative depending on the guy.
Headache of a QB situation brewing. Mediocre roster. Shitty location, bad cap situation due to past free agency spending sprees.
You're married to Daniel Jones. Location could be either a massive positive or a negative depending on the guy. Not much talent on the roster, but a massive amount of cap space coming your way. New York media is likely a negative.
You're married to Baker Mayfield. You have to move to a legendarily shitty location. You have a loaded roster, a passionate fan base, a competent GM, and some salary cap to play with though.
You have a good owner who is committed to winning. Decent roster that likely needs a makeover, but with absolutely no cap space to work with.
I would say that we're definitely ahead of Atlanta, Jacksonville, and Washington. We could be more attractive than Dallas or New York depending on the guy. Cleveland is definitely superior to us if you don't take anything in to account other than talent and cap space, but guys might not want to deal with Haslam, Mayfield, Odell, etc. I think we're in a pretty good position to snag a good coach. We're a decent location, have an owner who is committed to winning, have some good players and a lot of cap space. We're in a good spot to be turned around quickly.