Jump to content
Carolina Huddle
  • Hey There!

    Please register to see fewer ads and a better viewing experience:100_Emoji_42x42:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

MechaZain

NFL/PA deny targeting Eric Reid

Recommended Posts

If he lied then he’s done in the NFL and I feel like he would know that.

If Reid has access to the reports and releases them then this is gonna be a mess.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


@JARROD stop tap dancing like a little chickenshit and just come out and call Reid an uppity ****** like we all know you want to.

If mods won't handle it then longtime huddlers need to step in and start calling this poo for what it actually is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, rbsponsel52 said:

Seems nobody here can comprehend this. I bet not one of these people here have been in a situation getting hit with drug tests and being always being on the list each month unless they were part of military or a company. This has nothing to do with being targeted since that person being tested has nothing to fear by getting it done if they are clean or have a history of being clean for a test. If you have a history then you will most likely be the one getting hit because you used unauthorized substances several times in past.

As far as I know, Reid doesn't have a history of drugs so he should be tested as frequently as he has been.  It's not like he's built like LaRon Landry or something so there's no need for the frequent testing..

 

laron-landry1.jpg?w=1000&h=600&crop=0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So Reid is saying the dates and amount of times he’s been tested that showed up on the report are wrong.

He’s insinuating that that the NFL is leaving dates and tests off the report and the NFL is stating that Reid is lying...

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Giving him the benefit of doubt until I hear his side because that doesn't make sense. Lied knowing the NFL could say "we didn't test him this week" at anytime and blow the entire cover?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have serious doubts Eric Reid would be dumb enough to lie about that.

It's interesting how suddenly the NFL is credible and trustworthy again. It took them this long to respond to Reid? They can prove he lied about this, but they couldn't get the footage of Kareem Hunt themselves? Sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If this is true we should low ball the fug out of him, no other team wants to sign this guy, he can be had for 1 year 2.5 million.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

If he lied then he’s done in the NFL and I feel like he would know that.

If Reid has access to the reports and releases them then this is gonna be a mess.

lol fug the NFL, you can lie to them all you want, I could care less. This whole situation just probably costed Eric MILLIONS of dollars.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Say we give the NFL the benefit of the doubt and the highly unlikely scenario of the computer selecting Reid 7 out of 11 weeks is what actually happened.  Does the NFL just have no leeway to have a human with a brain step in and scratch his name after multiple selections.  Its like they wanted this controversy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Adb6368 said:

The NFLPA, whose job is to protect the players, determined there was nothing here. Case closed. Time to move on.

This is similar to when a police department investigates one of it's officers killing an unarmed POC.  It's their job to protect the people, but they usually just protect their own.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Skack25 said:

It's their job to protect the people

“Neither the Constitution, nor state law, impose a general duty upon police officers or other governmental officials to protect individual persons from harm — even when they know the harm will occur"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

lol @ anyone with a functioning brain touting the NFLPA. We saw what kind of actual clout the players association had during the last lockout. Empty suits.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, ChibCU said:

“Neither the Constitution, nor state law, impose a general duty upon police officers or other governmental officials to protect individual persons from harm — even when they know the harm will occur"

Maybe 'their job' was the wrong term.  But it is certainly a claim made by many police departments across the US.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, My Goodness My Guinness said:

Poo does happen, but the fact is that there was a 0.02% that this would happen in a randomized system, which in itself means that it's highly unlikely. It seems to me that it's an extremely reasonable argument to say "Hey, this seems unlikely to be coincidence." Would it still be crybaby culture if an investigation found that no player in the recorded history of NFL testing had a rate so high?

It would be completely ignorant to state that it was no coincidence without investigation.

ive stayed quiet until now, and if the NFLPA hadn’t endorsed this I would probably go with everyone else with it being harassment for Eric’s views.

and it’s still possible that the NFLPA says what they say for another motive besides it just being random chance.

if it’s uncovered without question that there is indeed messing with the “random” testing to “target” someone, I would be the first to condemn it.

just on the other hand, having seen first hand how improbable events happen to people I have to go with the NFLPA for now and just say it’s completely dumb luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, luke nukem said:

If this is true we should low ball the fug out of him, no other team wants to sign this guy, he can be had for 1 year 2.5 million.

This seems much more real than the drug testing. 

The guy was out of work for months until a guy like Tepper who doesn’t give a crap came along.

So I believe even if there wasn’t direct collusion, even implied collusion is there, black balling basically.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      19,838
    • Most Online
      2,867

    Newest Member
    Slapdad
    Joined
  • Topics

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      144,656
    • Total Posts
      4,725,869
  • Posts

    • Because I was addressing one specific clip here to try to understand what the issue with it was from your perspective because it seemed pretty cut and dry on the side of not being unreasonable. And you still haven't spoken on that.  Yeah, domestic violence sucks. Yeah, domestic violence by cops sucks. What the hell do you want there? Yeah, white supremacists suck. So now all cops are presumed to be white supremacists? Or cops are presumed to be spouse abusers? Philly has always been a hell hole, why are you shocked there?  Weird how despite the fact that I can agree when things are bad while not hating every cop because I realize individuals are responsible for their own actions, you seem to think I support those idiots. Of course, admitting that would show that you're actually the problem here but whatever.
    • how often do you get accused of being "very intelligent" officer? do you feel like there's a lot of brain power in your department?   studies show that police beat their partners at a rate 2-4x that of the national average. research conducted by the fbi revealed a concerted effort by white supremacists to infiltrate the police nationwide. in just the last week 72 cops in philadelphia alone were recently put on "administrative leave" after it was revealed that they were too stupid to lock down their social media accounts where they shared their racist memes. weird how despite those very real stories existing you were more concerned with your made up "research." who is walking around what here? people like you exist to deny brutality up to the point where it is completely undeniable. you then offer a meaningless "yeah that was bad" before moving on to your next defense. but you don't walk around the problem. how could you when you so clearly are the problem?
    • Of course, I'm mostly mad at myself for being disappointed in your lack of being reasonable in this entire topic. I've been able to (I think) have some reasonable discussion in here in areas where I both agree and disagree with others, but you are just an angry dude. But I've known that from other things you've said and at times, I feel like you're well meaning and others feel you're flat out toxic. Just sucks that instead of discussing things you draw the line at "do they agree with me" and if the answer is no, you go to ridicule/defensiveness/anger/name-calling. And we're all guilty of a little name-calling but that is a go-to for you.
×
×
  • Create New...