Jump to content
Carolina Huddle
  • Hey There!

    Please register to see fewer ads and a better viewing experience:100_Emoji_42x42:

WOW!!

Anybody still mad about the Rozier signing??

Recommended Posts

Looks like he has stepped up playing outside his role and might be a nice trade piece later down the line... Kupchak might have a clue after all hmmmmmmmmmm...

  • Beer 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


I was quite meh about him but hot damn; he's arguably a top-5 catch & shoot this year.  Makes it look like the Celtics simply weren't the right squad for him.   This Graham-Rozier thing is actually working out.  Solid backcourt in place.

  • Beer 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

was never mad about Roz.. with Kemba leaving at $32M and us grabbing Roz  at $19M - I was fine..
I was just set on him being starting PG and Graham being backup PG.. now that both are in starting lineup - would like a little more height (both are 6'1).. but not complaining on how both are playing..

need a better rim protector and rebounding.. Bridges is solid SF but i don't see him growing much more in "allstar" potential.. idk though.. just happy to have Roz, Graham, PJ and Bridges and watch them all grow for right now.. no real expectations so they are able to play free..

Edited by bLACKpANTHER
  • Beer 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, bLACKpANTHER said:

was never mad about Roz.. with Kemba leaving at $32M and us grabbing Roz  at $19M - I was fine..
I was just set on him being starting PG and Graham being backup PG.. now that both are in starting lineup - would like a little more height (both are 6'1).. but not complaining on how both are playing..

need a better rim protector and rebounding.. Bridges is solid SF but i don't see him growing much more in "allstar" potential.. idk though.. just happy to have Roz, Graham, PJ and Bridges and watch them all grow for right now.. no real expectations so they are able to play free..

Agreed.  With the lottery odds change these days, I say it wouldn't be terrible to target a trade to set us up with another guy long term.

Kuzma could be super interesting IMO.  Him and Miles Bridges are really close friends.  Also think Marvin and Monk could be part of a package for him. Marvin is actually a piece that the Lakers could benefit from to make a run. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not mad about the signing just annoyed by JBs usage. With Graham’s emergence and Rozier being handed the starting PG role to start the season Monk once again is an after thought. At least Bacon got a shot at cementing his role to start the year. Monk has been nothing more than a sporadic bench player that the staff doesn’t seem to keen on developing.

I though this season was going to be more about developing our draft picks than winning games. It’s looking like we are going to let another high potential lottery pick waste away on the bench. Should have just traded him last season while he still had some value.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Eazy-E said:

Not mad about the signing just annoyed by JBs usage. With Graham’s emergence and Rozier being handed the starting PG role to start the season Monk once again is an after thought. At least Bacon got a shot at cementing his role to start the year. Monk has been nothing more than a sporadic bench player that the staff doesn’t seem to keen on developing.

I though this season was going to be more about developing our draft picks than winning games. It’s looking like we are going to let another high potential lottery pick waste away on the bench. Should have just traded him last season while he still had some value.

 

I honestly believe if Monk was showing out in practice - he would be given minutes during games.. AND there's been no indication during the minutes he has had - that he would be a stud if given more minutes.. one game here and there where he goes off for 20 is one thing.. but if consistently was putting in +10pts/5rebs/3ast and shooting above .300% = i would be all for him getting more minutes.. but unfortunately that isn't the case

  • Beer 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, bLACKpANTHER said:

I honestly believe if Monk was showing out in practice - he would be given minutes during games.. AND there's been no indication during the minutes he has had - that he would be a stud if given more minutes.. one game here and there where he goes off for 20 is one thing.. but if consistently was putting in +10pts/5rebs/3ast and shooting above .300% = i would be all for him getting more minutes.. but unfortunately that isn't the case

So was Dwayne Bacon going off in practice or was it his sub par to average defense?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Eazy-E said:

So was Dwayne Bacon going off in practice or was it his sub par to average defense?

I think last year he was playing much better and earned some quality minutes in the beginning of the season.. was not performing like he was last year, and then the small injury he had set him back more.. and with the rise of Graham and Roz, he has taken a backseat.. tbh - i dunno

  • Beer 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Absolutely not, he is a fuggin bargin

Edited by Shocker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Many of you people are so bipolar.  Not every player is perfect or sucks.  Monk is a good piece especially with a better big and playmaking wing.  

He is 21.  21 years old.  Give him some time

Edited by Shocker
  • Pie 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Shocker said:

Many of you people are so bipolar.  Not every player is perfect or sucks.  Monk is a good piece especially with a better big and playmaking wing.  

He is 21.  21 years old.  Give him some time

I haven't closed the book on him by any stretch. He got 17 mins tonight n scored 3pts, 1 reb and 0 ast. Shot 1-3 from 3 and was 1-4 from field. All I'm saying is he ain't earning more mins with that stat line. No way no how. He has to get consistent 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lousy loss to raptors last night...yes they are better, but we should have won

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Graham was shooting poorly and he still took last shot of regulation (and missed a decent runner) but Bridges was cutting to basket wide open.. Lost in OT.. ahh, oh well

I like the fight we have.. Biz in starting lineup is killing us.. Zeller had a good night off the bench

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      20,328
    • Most Online
      3,693

    Newest Member
    diddyb
    Joined
  • Topics

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      147,532
    • Total Posts
      4,869,177
  • Posts

    • I’m pulling for the Chiefs, but feel the Niners are a more complete team.
    • Bernie's talk on the economy is a mirror image of Dr. King's. did you hear what he said at the last debate when grilled on calling himself a socialist? he said the same thing King did, that people like Trump have always had socialism. that we've given billionaires handouts, tax breaks, and everything in between and they've enjoyed all the fruits that go along with a system that works for them, while those at the bottom toil and suffer. "The problem is that we all too often have socialism for the rich and rugged free enterprise capitalism for the poor. That’s the problem. " - MLK i absolutely understand that you would like to hear more talk specifically about black people from him rather than a catch-all of 'the poor' or 'the working class.' that's reasonable and it's one thing i would change about his campaign. even though it's a term that keeps getting used, to me this is really not about 'a rising tide lifts all ships,' this is not about making everyone rich. we're not going to elect bernie and suddenly capitalism is all better and we're all millionaires who rose with the tide. to me it's about economic justice, and racial justice, which are inextricably linked. all of these things are linked to Bernie too, which is why some people get frustrated when he can't just focus on race. bring up race to him and he'll talk about it for a bit, then he'll talk about climate change, and he'll talk about billionaires, and he'll talk about etc etc. because he sees the systemic racism that America undeniably has as a symptom of its overarching disease that he wants to cure. i'm glad you are moving left, it's funny how that saying 'as you get older you get more conservative' has been totally flipped in the past decade. i barely know anybody who isn't more left than they were years ago. i think people seeing how Obama ended up a pretty corporate centrist when we thought he was going to change everything pushed people that way.
    • I mean Smitty asked us to retire it, so I’m in favor of that, but I like the way you’re thinking here.
  • Masters of PIE !

×
×
  • Create New...