All Activity

So yeah let’s blame a DC for failing to succeed after they pillaged your defense in every manner available to them to prop up their QB. For two hard years like scorched earth they tore that defense down and spent the proceeds on the offense. You know. Draft, cap, FA. Drained the defense. Whatever you think of Evero. Whoever the DC is. No one can compete with what they gave him. The whole organization should have been apologizing to him. I am no Evero homer but let’s be real.

Canales didn’t hire Evero. Just like he didn’t hire Jim Caldwell and Dom Capers. Doubtful the HC no one wanted had tons of power to do what he wanted here….which likely gets into our QB decisions please see my avatar picture if you are confused about the point made

Good game so far. Solid trench battles, two young well built defenses, and my 2 fave coaches. Stafford is really damn good. SEA OL is overperforming.

Okay then. To me that means Russell Wilson was Coryell. Because I see the proposition completely in the Russell Wilson punt/pass put it up for grabs mold. Count on the receiver to catch it or knock it down. And the reason I thought that was the intent with Legette is the abysmal downfield game from 2023. As in, there was barely any. I look at it as if… the result of a deep attempt isn’t as important as the opponent understanding they have to defend it. So I was all for some 50/50s. Coryell, Walsh whoever. I do favor the Coryell approach personally but also very much value versatility, it doesn’t have to be strict. Just make the defense defend the whole field, however you do it. It has to include downfield throws.

Sold, or in the process of being sold. Could be either way. Consider this for a second... Last season, our defensive coordinator steered what many have called the worst defense in NFL history. Canales would absolutely have been justified in firing him, and no one would have blamed him if he had. But what did he do? He gave Evero another chance to come back and prove he could be better. Does that tell us something about Canales? I think it does. Now apply that to Bryce

Canales has never been part of big YAC offenses in the NFL. That’s not his tree. Not in Seattle, Tampa or here. Every O he has been associated with basically has been bottom half of the league in YAC. That’s what Bryce needs to happen though 2 very different things….and very much gets into why the middle school QB doesn’t fit

Well, his job is to win and make Bryce better and other stuff too but he has to have a certain amount of buy in to make that work. If it is real or he has to talk himself into believing it, as coach and leader and in the context of the present time with the whole team needing to believe, who knows? You lie if you have to. I think you have have to separate that Canales from the detached offseason evaluation Canales. It is possible that you are correct and he is sold on Bryce. It is also possible that he isn’t, but cannot confess.

Ah yes, the old "accuse your opponent of what you're actually trying to do" tactic. Always amusing You wanna drop out? No problem, but you should probably do so by just admitting the conversation is over your head. Though truth be told, even if you don't wanna admit it, I'm pretty sure anyone reading this, watching you dodge the questions and just cut and paste the same recycled answers over and over again can probably already see that

IDK what her name is. The plastic desk lady.

That'd primarily be an example of a Coryell type receiver, though a WCO can sometimes take deep shots as well. The guys that are gonna best fit our attack though are the YAC guys, regardless of size.

until you address simple realties, there is no reason to follow your distractions away from it and all your predictable bologna. And I’m too old to fall for your baiting insults lol. 24th ranked offense 25th ranked passing offense 26th comp % Top 10 in bad throw % *and there are a LOT of people helping Bryce out this year in the NFL sucking in 2025. Because the production this year looks worse stacked up to last season. These are not the results of a QB that fits lol

Charrisa?

This Fox News lady is so fuging creepy. Where in the fug did they dig her up?

I really think the Rams are Superbowl bound

Not necessarily... What I honestly wish more people understood is that Canales doesn't necessarily look at Bryce the way we do. People are looking for excuses based on an assumption that he does. But I think if we're honest with ourselves, he doesn't. Canales may genuinely believe we can win, and even win big, with Bryce at question. Do I believe it? No, but what I, you or anyone else believes doesn't really matter. So basically, if Canales believes in Young, then He's going to continue working with him as the starter until there comes a point where he doesn't. That likely ends up being a sh-t sandwich for Panther fans, but what's new?

Point shaving.

Oof... as soon as I brag on him Kupp with a crucial fumble to cost the Seahawks a great scoring opportunity.

Man, the Rams really did nab two great ones in Kupp and as soon as he started aging out, Nacua. They're so similar too. Both have good size and aren't great athletes but are just really smart football players and great technicians and natural catchers, then they just have a knack to make plays after the catch despite not having great NFL athleticism.

Nah. I'm talking nuts and bolts football. You're trying to deflect from the fact that you don't understand the difference between a stylistic analysis and a measure of ability. You can go back to pre-draft analysis and you'll find a lot of the talk(even on this same board) had Bryce pegged as a WCO or possibly an E-P fit. That idea came from understanding the schemes and matching them to his streniand weaknesses as a prospect. (and yes, he has strengths; hell, even Manziel had strengths) Again though, since you seem to need this simplified even further, just answer these two questions: - Who was the college OC that Bryce thrived under? - What kind of concepts did he run in the NFL?

Rams supporters have got it so easy

How does that block in the back not get called on the sideline? Dude literally shoves him right in the back in front of the returner??

Good lord. If in that rambling you are saying we should all agree that the premise of the original post in this thread is valid? Keep dreaming. It was a strawman. False premise. Acting as if a ton of people were blaming Bryce for the loss. Which was not happening. To allow that stuff to go unchallenged, is worse.

I'm salty every time I see someones mid picks become stars while we throw first and second rounders over and over and they all stink outside of Tet (who still has a lot to prove, imo)

There is a contingent that is total Bryce but they weathervane with the wind. When the good Bryce wind blows about once or twice a month we hear a lot from them. But they are always pro Bryce, they just don’t pipe up too much when he sucks. I can’t speak for them, as far as what they are looking at. In a second contingent, the collective mind is made up. He has had had basically three years worth of starts that might include a top tier outing or two, a few second tier outings, offset by about the same number of bottom tier outings which actually may have the edge there. The rest of his stuff is third tier and that is going to be the bulk of his starts. We want to move on. And we aren’t getting off of that hill until he puts us off of it. He has not. There is a third contingent that has no conviction and definitely weather vanes. Bryce is good. Bryce isn’t good. Depending on the latest game. They will buy into 7 on 7 success so that should tell you something.

Nacua is really fuging good. He might be a better version of Cooper Kupp.