-
Posts
14,919 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Huddle Wiki
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by Growl
-
He isn’t going to do anything with protection because he’s a bad football player
-
The panthers would quite literally be better off with linderbaum going to the falcons or saints or buccaneers so as to avoid those team drafting a player who the coaching staff actually had to account for when they play. The ideal scenario for the panthers is linderbaum going to an nfc south rival.
-
LTs, though they have diminished in value themselves, are still expensive to acquire outside the draft if you want quality play. Centers and guards are not. Im not forgoing that reality to take a guy who will have such an ultimately nominal contribution to my team. Even RBs could be argued to be far more worth the selection given that at the very least a player like McCaffery can win a game. It’s still not a good idea to take a RB in the 1st round. But if you’re going to try and reduce the more complex process that is the draft to “I just want a good player,” then I’m at least burning the pick for someone who can make a major contribution. Centers don’t even meet that second rung of decision making. Taking one there is that bad an idea.
-
This is probably the problem. The game isn’t what it was then. Nobody’s trying to build a unit of FIVE HOGS who can WEAR THEM DOWN. centers don’t posses that value especially, and again, not forgoing a more valuable position elsewhere doesn’t equate to “it’s a one man show!” as some try to misrepresent the argument. It’s about opportunity cost. You aren’t getting an elite QB, or pass rusher, or pass defender, for pennies in free agency. You can get strong iOL play for a deflated cost.
-
not drafting a center at 6 overall doesn’t mean you have a bad offensive line, I’m not sure where this false equivalency is coming from colts fans are stupid and their team is stupid players like josh Allen, mike mcglinchey, minkah Fitzpatrick, and vita vea all went shortly after nelson. Quinton Nelson will never add a single win to the colts w/l total. yes, you absolutely take a CB or DT over a center with the 6th pick on the draft. Better to have an abundance of riches at a high impact position than to acquire a low impact position you could’ve solidified for pennies on the dollar in free agency.
-
this is stupid Ryan kalil never won a single game for this team People get so caught up “am I just getting a good player?” that better ran teams gleefully squeal as stupid teams take “sure things” ahead of them. well ran teams assess cost relative to need relative to value. you can buy quality interior line play for a percentage of what you pay virtually every other position on the field, the top 5 highest paid iOL don’t come close to the rest of the team. dumb little teams ran by people with dumb little brains will continue to flounder around in the squalor of their failure with quinton Nelson DOMINATING AS THE BEST GUARD IN THE LEAGUE while teams who deploy their resources relative to value will continue to win championships
-
what are you even criticizing hes just talking about a reality of the nfl
-
lol you said “he’s” not “he” and you said it more than once just a simple mistake huh
-
why would he do this
-
the old guard media types have been pushing this so hard, lacanfora would be devastated if Watson ended up here theres a reason you’ve seen these guys desperately pushing teams like Pitt to get involved
-
Why do people say stuff like this
-
Panthers close to deal with G Austin Corbett
Growl replied to UNCrules2187's topic in Carolina Panthers
because they don’t care about having a good center because they don’t subscribe to the moronic and dated tropes you do Defense doesn’t win championships pounding the rock doesn’t take you to the playoffs you don’t build through the draft -
It’s just signing bridgewater all over again; the draft has little to do with “this year.”
-
Sure, I pioneered the “bridgewater cost us a 3rd” bandwagon, I was groveling before the ink on his contract was dry. but Moore isn’t going to command a 1st. Even if he did, it’s still a pick you’re going to have to use on a WR. he just isn’t a viable to candidate to move, especially if you’ve got a rookie QB you need to surround with talent, which seems to be the way it’s trending.
-
The goal of a football team isn’t to acquire draft picks.
- 104 replies
-
- 12
-
-
It’s okay, I get it. A lot of fans just like being along for the ride, and that’s okay. Big picture conceptual discussions or draft philosophy that is more complex than “just coming away with a good player” is a lot like witchcraft to these individuals. No shame in it man.
-
You could’ve just said, “yeah, you’re right “ I wouldn’t have thought less of you for it.
-
Your premise is flawed, it’s centered around the idea that a team makes a QB, and not that a QB makes a team. We’ve seen more than enough evidence to prove that. A franchise QB is going to bring out a lot of positives, and diminish and a lot of flaws. Saying you don’t see a “franchise QB” in this class is not only subjective, it’s irrelevant. Drafting a QB in the top 10 is about as good of odds you’re going to get on finding a franchise guy, and if he flops extraordinary, then you’re in a position to take another guy. Either is preferable to the idea of “building around the QB” or “leaning on the run game” that so many here have so many nostalgic memories of and long to see replicated, because you’re just going to end up picking 10 or 15 or 19 or 21 year in and year out and likely out of reach for what it takes to build a team that can contend for a super bowl-a Quarterback. also, “make much positive impact on the 2022 season” who cares? What does this mean? The point of the draft isn’t about “making a positive impact on the current season.” it’s about evaluating opportunity cost relative to impact over the course of the next 10 seasons.
-
there’s nothing fantastical about the idea that the team improves to mediocrity and strands themselves there, it happens all the time and is usually the end result of playing the cutesy minimum investment plays we’ve made at the QB position. honestly the panthers have been pretty fortunate so far, they’ve absolutely made the moves to solidify themselves right in the center of the draft. Keep building aRoUnd ThE QuaRteRbaCk and you’re likely to entrench yourself there.
-
How far would the Stafford led Panthers have gone?
Growl replied to Sean Payton's Vicodin's topic in Carolina Panthers
The rams may indeed have a better roster. but panthers fans shouldn’t get too hung up sensationalizing the roster as a whole after last season. Poor QB play leaks it’s way into every component of the team. Good QB play elevates those around them, it just elevated the Rams to super bowl champions, and the Bengals to a spot in it. Robbie Anderson didn’t just turn into a bad player overnight. -
How far would the Stafford led Panthers have gone?
Growl replied to Sean Payton's Vicodin's topic in Carolina Panthers
As a matter of fact this team has a number of individuals who are well regarded as personnel evaluators. All the same it wouldn’t alter the reality of opportunity cost that drives the draft either way.