Mr. Scot

I didn't really have any issue with keeping those two guys. Frankly, there's a lot of our current staff that I'd be fine with keeping.

Sure, dude

You got triggered by "Sure, dude"? Wow! Would this be a bit of "protesting too much"?

Which again is baffling. Michael Lombardi's take on Frank is kind of interesting in that regard though.

Was thinking the same thing

Sure, dude

Wording matters here. Suggesting that Reich "didn't want" Bryce isn't really accurate. The idea that he might have wanted Carr or Stroud more than he wanted Bryce Is likely much more accurate.

No, I'm actually correcting what you said. "Tepper wasn't the one who wanted Bryce" would imply that it was somebody else's decision entirely. "Tepper wasn't the only one who wanted Bryce" says that he did indeed want him, but others did too. There's a difference.

I don't think anybody debates that Fitterer wanted Young. And no, they weren't likely to be alone either. The person most heavily in contention is Frank Reich (Josh McCown likely second). And although I'm not generally a fan of judging things by social media, It's pretty hard not to find the fact that Reich's daughter is liking posts saying that he wanted Stroud... interesting.

Two videos of Mike Lombardi from the Pat McAfee show... The idea of Reich being "broken" from some of his prior experiences actually make a lot of sense. As mentioned before, some of his choices here were just baffling. Also, his statement that the job could be considered desirable if it comes with a 6 year guaranteed contract is consistent with what's been said elsewhere. And McAfee's final comment is correct: Tepper still has to make the right choice.

The flipside narrative that everybody wanted Bryce as the first choice isn't exactly plausible either. I seriously doubt they went through that process with no disagreement whatsoever.

Wrong. His specific statement was that Tepper was not the only one who wanted Bryce. That very statement includes that Tepper wanted Bryce. He just wasn't alone in it. Then you put that together with his confirmation that Tepper did indeed chime in on the decision. Outside of that, there aren't any more specifics.

And one day, you might stop getting banned and making new screen names

Joe Person sums it up...

That line was actually just a rehash of what he said in his original tweet, not exactly earth shattering. People were using the original tweet to try and suggest that Tepper wasn't involved. That's not at all what Norris said.

He went 11-5 with Philip Rivers coming off his couch. IIt's incorrect to say that Reich never had any success.

You mean the same guy saying that Tepper claiming he didn't chime in on the decision was "rich"? Norris' statement that Tepper didn't "overrule everybody" doesn't mean he didn't influence the decision. He actually clarified that directly in a response to his tweet about Tepper claiming no involvement.

So what then is a post talking about other posts?

A little behind the scenes info... Anybody surprised?

Yet people are confidently saying that Tepper is telling the truth, despite reporting to the contrary. If "no one knows" then why should that viewpoint be believed either?

More...

That echoes what Stephen Holder said about it being "an open secret" around the league.

It says that Tepper is full of sh-t. (and it's true)

Doesn't mean I can't talk about it, or that I have to support it.