Mr. Scot
HUDDLER-
Posts
141,206 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Huddle Wiki
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by Mr. Scot
-
Stroud was my choice. I was hopeful after season's end... Then disappointed after the season opened... Now I'm getting hopeful as we near season's end again... I need some Dramamine
-
Richardson doesn't need anyone to take away his opportunities. He can do it himself
-
It can be fun for some recreational purposes. Not too worried about SkyNet taking over anytime soon, though. (especially if SkyNet tries running on Windows)
-
Fields...oy I still remember people pulling heavily for us to draft Fields. (Lance too)
-
Would be a pretty tough sell after the Rams game...
-
Yeah, Aubrey is nuts. Watch every other team try to find another guy like him in the offseason...and most of them fail.
-
I asked AI imaging to reproduce a picture of some of my budgies. What I got was an image of some kind of weird, unearthly budgie / conure / macaw hybrid
-
I was assured that was Bryce Have heard that Tagovailoa and JJ McCarthy among others aren't exactly setting the world on fire this season either.
-
Hell, the post was in a thread that isn't even about Bryce, but that's how it works around here Some of the same posters in this thread have also posted heavily in a couple of other threads where I'vw been active. Let's just say some of the takes were...less than reasonable. There are certainly reasonable takes, and I think you and I share one. There are also "we win in spite of him" arguments, which are among the silliest takes in the world to me
-
I can't. I gotta drive later
-
But still, it's Cleveland I don't claim to have seen all that much of Gabriel this year (not enough of a masochist to watch Browns games) but the "Factory of Sadness" is one of the league's funniest running gags to me Would be great if we could have a "Marvel What If" type of thing for football. I'd ask what would have happened if Tom Brady had been drafted by the Browns.
-
Still boggles my mind that there are people who tear him down.
-
I've argued in the past that a lot of history's biggest draft busts could have been saved by better coaching. Carr is one.
-
Well to be fair, Dillon Gabriel is being asked to succeed in Cleveland
-
I'm not convinced there's gonna be a huge market for Rico. He had a phenomenal four or five game stretch, but the wear and tear got to him. I think teams will see you can't extrapolate that to a full season. Sticking in a two back rotation is probably his best bet, though I get that it isn't guarantee he's going to see it that way.
-
Define "we", kemo sabe I don't see that post as addressing you, or others with a similar take. As mentioned above, there are indeed people on here with unreasonable / unrealistic expectations. Mind you, that's true on the pro-Bryce side too but it's a smaller crowd.
-
When we signed him I did a deep dive on his Houston days. One of the most surprising things I learned from it was that Chris Palmer didn't really put much effort into teaching Carr how to read a defense. Yes, you read that right Instead, they'd just write a play and tell him "throw it to this spot". Yeah How in the unmitigated hell a coach with years of actual NFL coaching experience believes something like that is a truly viable option... I'm just never gonna understand
-
Carr.
-
The sacks were only half the story. His early coaching was awful. I mean like Hue Jackson with the Browns level awful.
-
Nah. I hadn't seen it because that wasn't how I interpreted it. Don't know that I've seen anyone suggesting we tank (not really a practical suggestion with only four games left) though that element does hang around on an annual basis. Ditto the "hey this guy's good, let's trade him" crowd. They show up every year As to the Cam comparisons, that was kind of the point. Stroud, Fields, Richardson and others weren't true examples of a Newtonesque archetype, yet a lot of the people arguing they should be the pick invoked Cam's name on the logic that they were. What I think you're ultimately doing here is somewhat conflating your take with others. No, you're not doing the things talked about, but others are. And those are the ones being referenced in posts like that one. As mentioned, my whole thing is arguing not to keep Bryce long term but remaining realistic and substantive in the context of those arguments. That may be a lot to ask in a sports talk setting these days, but hey...
